As the resident normie, I'd say you're all crazy like a tub full of hyperactive gerbils.

It sucking to put on a polyester uniform and work at a minimum wage slave job that destroys your humanity has what to do with overpopulation? Should the poor be killed so that I can be put out of my misery? I could kinda sorta agree with that if there weren't people other than myself I'd support putting out of their misery first. At least I'd like to watch them die before I follow them.

So some of the things you say are dumb as **** and nobody should listen to them. At least the specifics, as the general vibe of what you say is often relevant but sometimes... yeesh.

Wait Maria's gay????








What's up girl, asl?

Don't be OH.

Gates represents something that actually hurts you. I’ve never been able to visualize any kind of solution that doesn’t hit a wall caused by overpopulation. Any type of utopian vision I can dream up only allows for a few million people. The there’s too ****ing many of us problem ****s up everything. Look, really what we need is tribal anarchism. Space to do our own thing. That means billions need to leave the ****ing planet. I can’t get around that. Actually that really doesn’t waver in my mind. For instance, I always felt the Burmese were right to run off those Muslims. Myanmar is not an intrusive country. They got their space carved out in the world. It’s established. They have a right to it. When they stood their ground and drove those people out I felt like they were doing the entire world a favor. You wanna live in Myanmar? Start by being Burmese. It doesn’t apply to the United States though. The USA shouldn’t exist and I’ve remained steady on that belief as well.

The only thing I can see that can deal with this problem is nuclear holocaust. There simply is no alternative possible. Nobody is going to enact any kind of policy that reduces human population, probably at all, but certainly not to any meaningful degree. And so you're left with a nuclear war.

And a nuclear war will not lead to tribal anarchism. It will simply lead to a reduced population everywhere. There would still be muslims in Burma. Just less of them. Like there would be less "traditional Burmese".

There would still be blacks in the US, just less of them. There would still be Muslims in Europe, just less of them. There would still be whites in South Africa, just less of them. Just as there would be less "traditional" races in those same places.

?

Demographic shift isn't something that you can deal with without advocating for actively fascist policies and then you'd have to prove that those policies would be both implementable and sustainable.

What if the UN implemented a global policy to greatly reward voluntary sterilization?

What if after profoundly reducing the world’s population technology like CRISPR was used to really get serious about weeding out the garden and controlling human evolution to be smart, beautiful, and cooperative?

Are you talking about, say, weeding out the black population in America by paying them as disproportionately poorer members of society to sterilize themselves, and not only doing this in practice but in theory? Actively saying, let's trick black people into sterilizing themselves for food stamps?

OH does nazi the problem with eugenics

church