Music Banter

Music Banter (https://www.musicbanter.com/)
-   New Releases Ratings Forum (https://www.musicbanter.com/new-releases-ratings-forum/)
-   -   Radiohead : The Best Of (https://www.musicbanter.com/new-releases-ratings-forum/30902-radiohead-best.html)

swim 01-04-2009 05:19 PM

Best of's are obsolete.

Farfisa 01-04-2009 06:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by swim (Post 573473)
Best of's are obsolete.

.

mannny 01-04-2009 09:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dac (Post 573256)
In my opinion, people would more likely be interested after listening to The Bends or In Rainbows as opposed to this compilation. The song selection is fine and all, I just feel that Radiohead doesn't work as well as a 'singles' kind of band.

Agreed. Especially since their albums vary in style so much.

scottsy 01-04-2009 09:28 PM

Best of albums definitely do work better for "singles" or hits bands... radiohead really aren't that kind of band, more of an albums type band, thusly, people would be best to check their back catalogue of albums, rather than a compilation of single songs of very different styles...

loveissucide 01-03-2010 12:48 PM

Their discography is too varied for such a representation, and it should surely be put in chronological order to emphasise their growth.

OceanAndSilence 01-03-2010 04:54 PM

my parents got me this for christmas two years ago when i already have the box set :(

radiohead's albums are ventures representing the status of the band; i don't think this compilation works. still got some good songs on it, although there's so many good tracks that were left out.

jayfin3 01-03-2010 08:18 PM

I agree. You can't understand Radiohead without listenening to the albums in full. At least, it's that way for me with In Rainbows, Hail to the Thief, Amnesiac, Kid A, and Ok Computer

eunhaelai 01-04-2010 12:17 PM

I agree. esp. for radiohead since their music is situated where you need to listen to the album all the way through, and not random songs. I tried that with the ipod one day with shuffle... and boy did it kill the flow of radiohead.

Stone Birds 01-04-2010 01:09 PM

it doesn't have "Weird Fishes" damn i love that song... i rated very good because... well... c'mon it's radiohead.

scottsy 01-09-2010 12:05 AM

I could actually make my own carbon copy of The Best Of... due to the fact I have every Radiohead album! Hurrah!

Serge_Gee 01-11-2010 04:57 AM

lets be realistic...this album isnt for the massive radiohead fans...this is to introduce new fans to their sound...so yeah...shame that you loose the "magic" of normal track progression within their albums...but otherwise its a good product!

cp77 01-11-2010 12:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by eunhaelai (Post 794357)
I agree. esp. for radiohead since their music is situated where you need to listen to the album all the way through, and not random songs. I tried that with the ipod one day with shuffle... and boy did it kill the flow of radiohead.

Yup, especially with Kid A ... my roommate has it on 10" vinyl. Just gotta start with side A and just keep flippin' it over!

Shake 01-11-2010 01:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by loveissucide (Post 793805)
Their discography is too varied for such a representation, and it should surely be put in chronological order to emphasise their growth.

I think this sums it up. There was a lot of talk about cohesion and flow, and to truly represent the band you need to have it in chronological order. That being said, I am a big fan, and bought it to listen to in the car, so that I don't have to keep changing discs. But for someone who's just getting into the band (ie, the kind of person most likely to buy a "best of" compilation) it seems scattered, and may scare some first timers off.

Although, if you're just getting into Radiohead now, whatthe Hell were you doing for the past 18 years?:rofl:

scottsy 01-17-2010 12:03 AM

Your last sentence definitely raises a good point!

storymilo 01-17-2010 12:34 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Shake (Post 808904)
I think this sums it up. There was a lot of talk about cohesion and flow, and to truly represent the band you need to have it in chronological order. That being said, I am a big fan, and bought it to listen to in the car, so that I don't have to keep changing discs. But for someone who's just getting into the band (ie, the kind of person most likely to buy a "best of" compilation) it seems scattered, and may scare some first timers off.

Although, if you're just getting into Radiohead now, whatthe Hell were you doing for the past 18 years?:rofl:

Being born.

scottsy 01-17-2010 10:03 AM

Equally valid...


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:16 AM.


© 2003-2024 Advameg, Inc.