![]() |
In the wake of Michael Jackson’s death, people are now re-examining his influence on music. In this context, the Beatles are often credited as being the only artists to have a similar or greater impact on popular music. This debate can get really intense and often polarizing along a number of lines (race, age, etc). In terms of artistry, performance, industry, and other aspects of musical culture, as to who has had the greater influence.
source: Influence: Michael Jackson vs. The Beatles | Straight Gangsterism |
Quote:
|
Influence can't be assessed with any degree of accuracy, so arguments over that are pointless. And as I always say influence can be bad as well as good. All you can really do is judge people on what they themselves have done.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Thats Objective. What IS subjective is: Out of the two who had the greater influence? I personally feel Michael had the greater impact even though I like and respect the Beatles. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Could MJ’s influence and audience be bigger than the Beatles because the record industry was about 1000 times larger than it was in the 60s? |
Quote:
|
The Beatles still had a widespread influence across to areas like the far east and South America. And the size of the record industry may help distribute music more but it can also provide much more music as well so one artist can't really dominate as much perhaps. The internet has changed things, but during that period Michael Jackson didn't really release much new music anyway.
By credit for the work of others I mean for instance that, for example, The Beatles may have influenced many Britpop groups in the 90s but that doesn't mean they wrote their songs, they just influenced them, that's all. |
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:37 PM. |
© 2003-2025 Advameg, Inc.