Music Banter

Music Banter (https://www.musicbanter.com/)
-   Pop (https://www.musicbanter.com/pop/)
-   -   Michael Jackson (https://www.musicbanter.com/pop/4378-michael-jackson.html)

Bulldog 11-13-2008 07:22 AM

I can stand him. I do think some of his songs are good but nothing much more really. And if I hear Billy Jean one more time I'll probably go nuts

sarahunter 11-15-2008 09:26 AM

Hi,

Michael Jackson still one of the greatest artists that ever lived, IMO.

:clap:

Sara.


Quote:

Originally Posted by Henrah (Post 36559)
ok, i generally for rock music and whatever, but ive recently been getting into some michael jackson, what do you guys think? ignore the whole him being strange thing, and the pedophile thing, and the turning white thing, and lets talk about his music.....bille jean kicks arse!


thomasbreaker 11-15-2008 11:43 PM

Billie Jean on AI
 
What do you think about AI's David Cook's version on Billie Jean? I thought it was very creative of him.

ProggyMan 11-16-2008 12:00 AM

It was the Chris Cornell version. So no.

bathory_79 11-17-2008 03:55 PM

musically, he's a fantastic guy.
otherwise, he's a complete idiot.

shamy732 11-21-2008 11:11 AM

i STILL listen to MJ...he's songs our timeless and still get me in the mood to party or snap my fingers...ya know...turns out he's just a creepy pervert..kinda like R. Kelly

thomasbreaker 11-24-2008 07:16 PM

"Michael Jackson avoided a much-anticipated appearance in London's High Court by reaching an out-of-court settlement with Sheik Abdulla bin Hamad Al Khalifa, the prince of Bahrain, who was suing him for $7 million." from TIME

I think he is in trouble again.

mjscarousal 11-24-2008 08:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by thomasbreaker (Post 551229)
"Michael Jackson avoided a much-anticipated appearance in London's High Court by reaching an out-of-court settlement with Sheik Abdulla bin Hamad Al Khalifa, the prince of Bahrain, who was suing him for $7 million." from TIME

I think he is in trouble again.

True but his not in trouble again, he was just USED again.

After Michael's acquittal in 2005, he retreated to Bahrain to relax and to recover from the horrible ordeal he had to deal with. The King and the prince of Bahrain offered him in and gave him gifts. They made Michael sign certain things but Michael during the time thought the king was being kind out of the kindness of his heart especially since it was RIGHT after the trial. He wasn't focused on contracts, music or anything business. He just wanted to get his state of mind back on track Michael thought he was just being a supporter but he had a different agenda.

He wanted Michael to do concerts and he also wanted Michael to sign on his record label and record an album. He talked about this with Michael but nothing was finalised. The King of Bahrain and prince are/ were mad because they wanted Michael to do an album and concert.Michael came back over to the states and got back on track. His recording an album over here and not assocaited with them or record label. They were just using Michael for their own greed and fame. Sine he didn't get what he wanted he wants money? for what its? bulli****, his just mad.
So ONCE again Michael was used but the KING decided he wanted to settle, Michael was willing to fight it but the whole thing was joke to begin with.

Urban Hat€monger ? 11-24-2008 08:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mjscarousal (Post 551263)
They were just using Michael for their own greed and fame. Sine he didn't get what he wanted he wants money? for what its? bulli****, his just mad.

Yeah paying all his living expenses for a year and building him a recording studio.

What a greedy bastard he is :rolleyes:

Mystique 11-25-2008 07:21 AM

Musically he's one of the most influential artists of the 20th century, but otherwise he's...well...weird.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:55 PM.


© 2003-2025 Advameg, Inc.