Surell |
11-20-2012 11:40 AM |
Punk, surprisingly enough, as I love the aesthetic appeal (super irony, post modern/meta commentary, mohawks), is not a genre i'm too familiar with, and don't often go to except in the most significant of cases, like going back to the classics we're name dropping (Ramones, Clash, Heads, Minutemen) or coming across one who revives traditional forms with great conviction (like Iceage or Trash Talk). But, as I said, what especially drives Punk home for me is a lot of the aesthetic, or the attitude. I'm content with the few bands I know, they seem to do the genre best.
But I can definitely see it becoming stagnant when you hand around the sound too long- I get the same feeling if I listen to the of Blues too long. And while it is kind of sadly ironic that a genre focused on nonconformity should find such a uniform sound, but at the same time, it's also a genre that lashed out against genres like metal and Prog, showing a distaste not only for virtuoso playing but constant development or grand ideas as well.
Besides, just the fact that they brought about some of the greatest bands with some of the best songwriting abilities imaginable (a world without the Heads or Minutemen would not be worth living in) is enough for me to be happy. As a style, at its roots and in great multitude, maybe it is a little grating and unoriginal. Punk was not only a music form, though, but a subculture, and perhaps it prevailed more in that respect.
|