Unknown Soldier |
07-01-2010 01:16 PM |
Quote:
Originally Posted by highlydope
(Post 893000)
I dunno. I'm always wondering how much of becoming a more popular band has to do with some sort of formula, vs skill, timing, or even just luck.
Take the Pixies for example, there's an example of a skilled band who had an original formula that appealed to a wide audience, yet they never hit it big back in the day. Maybe it was just timing considering how popular they seem to be today.
My point is, there's many variables to why a band "makes it big" and in many cases I think accessibility is not necessarily the highest priority on the list.
|
Accessibility very much so, if you want to appeal to a world wide audience and to as many types of music listeners as possible. Nirvana are the perfect example and equally appeal to metal heads and popsters. If on the other hand you just want to break through into the mainstream like the Pixies, then accessibility helps but certainly not essential.
As you said variables such as formula, timing and luck also play a big part in it as well. I know a number of potentially big bands that fell by the wayside because they lacked some of the above factors. One band that comes to mind are probably Diamond Head back in the late 70`s and early 80`s one of the most talented English metal bands ever but variable factors eluded them and the only reason they are now remembered is that Metallica have always covered their music.
Back on topic though, the Melvins are special and were extremely experimental in a genre that back in the 80`s wasn`t anywhere near as flexible as it is now, so maybe not ruling the world was their decision or just timing.
|