| Fender |
07-16-2009 02:13 AM |
Quote:
Originally Posted by dac
(Post 703387)
Did you even listen to Stadium Arcadium?
|
Yeah I did. I actually think it is underrated. Most the people I know write it off because of the couple of tracks that were played on the radio. As far as hits go, Stadium Arcadium is weak, however as a whole, I think it is a solid album. Furthermore, Frusciante will be the first to admit that SA is the album where he had the most freedom (Solo Work Aside). He layers effectively and he is one of the best at using lead flourishes with rhythm guitar. It's the Hendrix influence in him.
And I agree with you Boo Boo about Frusciante not existing without many of the big names on the list. He's had so many influences, but he does have his own tone, and it's extremely unique. I always find it interesting that it always takes me longer to properly learn a song by Frusciante than a song by many of the more technically savy guitarists. I can learn a technically challenging song by Vai before I can imitate the tone that Frusciante utilizes. I know that doesn't hold any water in this discussion, nor is it the reason that I believe Frusciante is better than 98.
I just feel that because he is a big name and because he played for the RHCP it actually plays against him in a forum discussion like this, bc the tendency is to stray away from mainstream. We hear these names that get mentioned so often we get tired of hearing them. I could be wrong. Just my opinion.
I guess what I like about Frusciante is that he plays with a lot of feel. He puts a lot of soul in his music and isn't just wanking on a technical solo for 10 minutes. Most of his solos are really simple, but they have a lot of color to them. Even is solo work is incredibly simple. He doesn't focus on impressing others, he focuses on sound. Lol this paragraph is full of ambiguity, which isn't exactly useful in an argument. So I am sorry for rambiling.
|