Quote:
Bogus? |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
I'd take Too Fast For Love & Shout At The Devil over anything Dokken have ever done.
Who cares if Vince Neil can barely sing a note, it's hair metal, not opera. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Motley - 1 Dokken - **** off |
Quote:
Motley - 1 Dokken - Isn't even bothering to keep score, too busy rocking |
Quote:
Drug bands - 2 Suckass non-drug bands - so lame they should start playing polka |
Wasted - Johnny Thunders
Never taken a drug in his life - Gene Simmons 3 : 0 |
Wasted - Replacements
Never taken a drug in his life - Ted Nugent 4 : 0 |
Bill Clinton
Drugs: 420 No drugs: -184,403,285,394 |
I personally favor Motley way over Dokken, though I do like some of Dokken's stuff.
I think all the Motley albums from the 80s hold up pretty well, except for maybe Theatre of Pain. The mixing on that album, aside from the singles, isn't the greatest. Its still pretty Motley though. To me, Motley is glam metal and glam metal is Motley. They represent the genre 100%. |
Let's face it, Dokken's only real redeeming quality is Lynch.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
And as an aside, John Lennon wrote some of his best work after recognizing how much of his life had been destroyed by his behavior, and attempting to clean up his act. The trend isn't so much that "drugs = good music", rather they destroy people's lives, which gives them a very dark and realistic point of view to write songs from. Saying that hard drugs are awesome based on that is like hearing a song written by a genocide survivor, and shouting "Wooo! Genocide's are awesome, they make for the best songs!" And lastly, drugs were responsible for Atilla (Billy Joel's Psych/Metal band from his early years). |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
One of the best blues/rock bands during the 70s for sure. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
If you don't like any of these bands, then I'll take back my original statement. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
The fact is that Aerosmith did exactly what every other generic southern-rock band in the 70's did, sharing the same influences, and very few people cite them as a major influence. If Aerosmith hadn't existed, would the world of rock really have changed all that much? I challenge you to name one band that would have never been formed if they hadn't heard Aerosmith (and Aerosmith cover bands don't count, obviously). |
You've picked three examples from their post Permanent Vacation period.
When people refer to Aerosmith as one of the greatest rock bands in history they're referring to their 1970s output. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
#2 - Tons of rockers from the mid to late 70s and after cite Aerosmith as influences. Rock This Way || What Other Artists Has Said About Aerosmith |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
And as has been said I've got no idea why you keep referring to Aerosmith as southern rock. To save going round in circles, who are some of your favourite bands or types of music? |
Quote:
Now let me break something down. Aerosmith is rock. Steven Tyler (much like Bruce Springsteen *shudders*) often pretends to be a country singer. Thus, they would like to be country rock, also known as southern rock. Unless the definition changed again... And I am pretty sure Hetfield and Slash would have become musicians if not for Aerosmith. Just because they liked them doesn't mean that they needed them. Both were practicing music before they'd ever even heard Aerosmith. |
Quote:
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:42 AM. |
© 2003-2024 Advameg, Inc.