GrapevineFires |
08-21-2012 07:02 AM |
Quote:
Originally Posted by Glassjawx
(Post 1199060)
A few days ago, my girlfriend and I were discussing our tastes in music. She likes bands like La Dispute, Explosions in the Sky, Radiohead, Glassjaw, and Modest Mouse, but she claims not to like rock music. I was puzzled. Most of the bands she likes would fall under rock as a sub-genre of rock.
She said this - "I don't like rock, I like post-rock."
I tried explaining to her that that's basically impossible. A lot of the music she listens to, I would say, is a form of rock. Post-rock isn't usually a term that bands in the "post-rock" scene/genre identify themselves as. In fact, they try to steer clear of being called post-rock, as it sort of implies that rock is dead and gone.
What do you guys think? Is my girlfriend making sense? Is post-rock just a term coined by critics, or is it something entirely separate from rock?
Your feedback would be much appreciated. Thanks.
|
I agree with your girlfriend. I have a similar opinion infact.
I love Post-Rock. But I'm not a fan of modern rock.
Rock music is generally the same as pop music, but less accessible. Post rock is completely different as it doesn't tend to follow any patterns of verses, choruses and bridges that rock and pop do.
This isn't why it's better, this si why they are different.
^This is a very general explanation - there will be exceptions.
|