Music Banter - Limp Bizkit - Nookie - deep subtle message revealed

Quote:

Originally Posted by MyName (Post 1281513)

Black Francis - Actually, I listen to Deftones/LB depending on my mood. But if I had to choose I actually prefer Deftones a bit more. Its just that Back to School is a bad song and that style of music is not fit for them. I'm a very realistic person and I don't just mindlessly defend everything a band I like does. F.e. some things that bother me about LB.

Almost whole RMV album is bad and its B-sides make me vomit. I also hate Durst's rapping/screaming voice in some songs, f.e. rapping in "Hot Dog" and screaming in "Get a life". Sounds too high pitched and annoying.

But then again I like his rapping in songs like "Combat Jazz" and "Bring it Back" and screaming in "Eat you alive"

I actually like Durst's singing and I think their version of the song is better than The Who's. I think The Who's version is simply outdated and that their singer's accent is very unpleasant. That's not to say Limp Bizkit never did bad covers, I literally laughed my ass off when they did a cover of Opiate(originally by Tool). He made OPIATE sound cheerful like an intro song of some children show.

Limp Bizkit - Rollin interpretation coming today. Its a very profound and meaningful song and it'll be a joy to reveal its message.

This thread is on the bizarre side, but two things finally got my attention:
1) Yeah, the admission from a long-time member that many of the people around here seem to only contribute nastiness instead of well-meaning music discussion.
2) The claim that the "Behind Blue Eyes" cover is good - because despite the reaction of most critics and music fans, it is good, which I've said before.

Though the "Faith" cover is terrible, and Limp Bizkit is not a good band overall. But Durst himself isn't as douchey and untalented as most people think, and I can't rule out that "Nookie" has a deeper meaning than what I've always believed.