Whats the difference between Nirvana & Weezer?

14232949 · 06-03-2014, 12:38 PM

Here's a difference. How many B-Sides, rarities, compilations, bootlegs, unreleased material has been released from Nirvana? Plenty. Lots and lots.
It all sounds the same. All very atypically grungy.

They've never had a 'songs from the black hole' and they never will.

Also, have Nirvana ever actually made anyone feel something. Many people point to Pinkerton and Blue as albums that helped them grow emotionally.
Does anyone ever look at Bleach or Nevermind and say this is my go-to album when such happens or this is pivotal in my growth as a person? (not to be mistaken with growth in music taste)

Maybe I'm speaking for myself but the only thing Nirvana's music causes me to do is roll my eyes and turn down the volume.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Black Francis

The main difference to me is that they play 2 different styles of music, i can't think of a weezer song that sounds like Nirvana, to me they sound more like the pixies, i mean 'i bleed' is basically 'the sweater song' with a few tweaks

Still, it doesn't mean Weezer was just rip off of the pixies they had their own originality to them, same as nirvana, both bands are 2 different from each other, Nirvana is more like an overproduced garage grunge band and Weezer is more like a college band that are polished musicians but play stupid songs.

I think Kurt was a better Artist but Rivers is a better musician cause if you measure both bands by their guitars and song arrangements, Weezer is actually better, they have better backup vocals, better guitars, better solos but NOT better drums, Nirvana had better drumming with dave and a more genuine angst with their music and a better developed signature sound.

I luv both bands but i think there is little comparison between the 2

the two bolded statements...

A). Surely if anyone could be suspected of this, it's Nirvana.
B). You have listened to Pinkerton, haven't you?