|
Register | Blogging | Today's Posts | Search |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
![]() |
#1 (permalink) | |
Dr. Prunk
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Where the buffalo roam.
Posts: 12,156
|
![]() Quote:
They werent a touring band for the latter half of the 60s, but does that make the music they made during that period insignificant?... Of course it dosent. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 (permalink) | |
Music Addict
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Side II of Band Of Gypsies
Posts: 301
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 (permalink) |
Account Disabled
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Hot-lanta
Posts: 3,061
|
![]()
Since each band I am about to mention put out material in the 70's, does that still make them less influential than KISS?
Pink Floyd Bob Dylan The Beatles The Rolling Stones Queen Rush Sex Pistols Jimi Hendrix David Bowie Johnny Cash |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 (permalink) | |
Music Addict
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Side II of Band Of Gypsies
Posts: 301
|
![]() Quote:
so my answer is yes.(aside from the beatles and the stones or Hendrix - all 60s bands) KISSes impact on Pop-Culture dwarfs the rest of them.( aside from Beatles/Stones/Jimi who were 60s acts.) |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|