10 Reasons Why The Rolling Stones Were Better Than The Beatles (blues, country) - Music Banter Music Banter

Go Back   Music Banter > The Music Forums > Rock & Metal > Rock N Roll, Classic Rock & 60s Rock
Register Blogging Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
Welcome to Music Banter Forum! Make sure to register - it's free and very quick! You have to register before you can post and participate in our discussions with over 70,000 other registered members. After you create your free account, you will be able to customize many options, you will have the full access to over 1,100,000 posts.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 01-25-2005, 07:38 AM   #21 (permalink)
Groupie
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: London, UK
Posts: 38
Default

Keith Richards is funny as f*ck in interviews, total legend.

The Beatles probably never recorded a song better than Paint It Black but eh, gimme both.
RedEye is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-25-2005, 05:41 PM   #22 (permalink)
Groupie
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Illinois by way of MA
Posts: 32
Default

Keith Richards actually said "The Rolling Stones destroy people at an alarming rate. Something about us makes them come face-to-face with themselves, sometimes for the better, sometimes in the worst possible way."

Which eliminates him from being "cool".
Are_You_Experienced? is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-26-2005, 06:17 AM   #23 (permalink)
dog
this bird has flown
 
dog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: paris,texas
Posts: 860
Default

geez i dunno y people are putting so much effort into this..
__________________
formerly ledzeppelinrulz.

http://theraffinkids.bandcamp.com/

music^
dog is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-26-2005, 11:04 AM   #24 (permalink)
The Sexual Intellectual
 
Urban Hat€monger ?'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Somewhere cooler than you
Posts: 18,605
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ledzeppelinrulz
geez i dunno y people are putting so much effort into this..
Beatles fans getting their knickers in a twist over the fact someone doesn`t think they`re the greatest band ever perhaps?
Urban Hat€monger ? is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-26-2005, 11:06 AM   #25 (permalink)
Music Addict
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Ohio
Posts: 80
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Urban Hatemonger
Beatles fans getting their knickers in a twist over the fact someone doesn`t think they`re the greatest band ever perhaps?
I agree
kornslayer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-26-2005, 11:10 AM   #26 (permalink)
Let it drip
 
Sneer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 5,430
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Urban Hatemonger
Beatles fans getting their knickers in a twist over the fact someone doesn`t think they`re the greatest band ever perhaps?
i dont think they are the greatest band ever though. based on chart success i do- which isnt tooooo important. but personally i think zeppelin and pink floyd were better. just prefer the beatles to the stones- that is all.
Sneer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-26-2005, 11:53 AM   #27 (permalink)
Groupie
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Illinois by way of MA
Posts: 32
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Urban Hatemonger
Beatles fans getting their knickers in a twist over the fact someone doesn`t think they`re the greatest band ever perhaps?
It's not that--I do prefer the Stones--so much as it is the threadstarter choosing the dumbest reasons possible.
Are_You_Experienced? is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-26-2005, 01:37 PM   #28 (permalink)
The Sexual Intellectual
 
Urban Hat€monger ?'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Somewhere cooler than you
Posts: 18,605
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Are_You_Experienced?
It's not that--I do prefer the Stones--so much as it is the threadstarter choosing the dumbest reasons possible.
I was being irreverent, I didn`t ask for people to take it so seriously
Urban Hat€monger ? is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-27-2005, 06:51 PM   #29 (permalink)
Groupie
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Places
Posts: 33
Default

Well you obviously knew you were going to tread on peoples feet.

The Rolling Stones are matierialistic overbloated wrinkly rock grampas who refuse to let go of their fleeting fame.

I personally believe that the Stones initiated the whole school of insincere rock music. They're music is totally playing on peoples emotions and on trendyness at the time.

The Beatles on the other hand CREATED the trend instead of following it.

Whatever it's all a matter of opinion and I have just as much of a right to state mine as You do yours so don't tell me that im "overreacting" or taking it too seriously. Thats a pathetic defense to a sensible offense.
Enfilade is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-27-2005, 07:02 PM   #30 (permalink)
The Sexual Intellectual
 
Urban Hat€monger ?'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Somewhere cooler than you
Posts: 18,605
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Enfilade

The Rolling Stones are matierialistic overbloated wrinkly rock grampas who refuse to let go of their fleeting fame.
You`ll notice I named this thread 10 Reasons Why The Rolling Stones WERE Better Than The Beatles , as opposed to 10 Reasons Why The Rolling Stones ARE Better Than The Beatles.
Urban Hat€monger ? is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Similar Threads



© 2003-2024 Advameg, Inc.