Music Banter

Music Banter (https://www.musicbanter.com/)
-   Rock N Roll, Classic Rock & 60s Rock (https://www.musicbanter.com/rock-n-roll-classic-rock-60s-rock/)
-   -   The Rolling Stones vs. The Beatles (https://www.musicbanter.com/rock-n-roll-classic-rock-60s-rock/8302-rolling-stones-vs-beatles.html)

bungalow 09-01-2006 10:50 PM

I'm lost as to why it is a stupid argument. Isn't this the Beatles vs. Stones thread?
It's not like we are arguing over whose d*ck is bigger.

tdoc210 09-01-2006 10:51 PM

betles pwn mick jagger, they pwn that vocalist n00b. with georges swett haxXx

Raine 09-01-2006 10:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bungalowbill357
I'm lost as to why it is a stupid argument. Isn't this the Beatles vs. Stones thread?
It's not like we are arguing over whose d*ck is bigger.

well . . . .
it doesn't matter as the guys from The beatles are cuter thant he guys of The rolling Stones so i'd probably screw lennon if it were possible and if he dind't have a penis

boo boo 09-02-2006 12:55 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ShadowSurfer
That's merely your opinion.Some would say 2000 Light Years From Home is just as definative psychadelia as anything the Beatles put out there. And who are you kidding? The Beatles stole that whole trip from Brian Wilson and Pet Sounds.

You're a true f*cking idiot, Sgt Peppers was inspired by Pet Sounds, which in turn was influenced by Rubber Soul, I guess it's ok to borrow from The Beatles, just not the holy f*cking almighty Beach Boys.

Quote:

Ya, right. The Beatles admit they stole it all from Brian Wilson and Pet Sounds.
No they didn't, don't just make sh*t up and expect people to believe it... Being inspired by something and ripping something off is far from the same thing, if it was, then The Beach Boys ripped off Buddy Holly so it dosen't really matter, aside from that there's also the fact that the two albums sound virtually nothing alike... Sgt Peppers was more influenced by Freak Out! anyway.

Quote:

As I said, Pet Sounds predates anything experimental by The Beatles.
But it was heavly influenced by Rubber Soul, which was influenced by Highway 61 Revisited, which was influenced by Robert Johnson, who was influenced by Satan, every musician is just ripping off Satan, that's a fact.

Spike*Spiegel 12-14-2006 10:21 PM

Stones. for sure. id kill to see them live, again.

ThirdEyeOpen 12-14-2006 10:29 PM

The Beatles hands down. I hate it when people say all the Beatles' songs sound the same. Listen to any of their albums starting with "Help!" all the way to the end. You'll be hard pressed to find two songs on the same album that sound the same. If you look at "Abbey Road", "I Want You" follows "Octopus' Garden". Those two songs could not sound any different.
As for the Stones, eh. I like them and all, I respect them as a band and love some of their songs, but they are dragging it out way too long. The Stones should have stopped touring a long time ago. There's no mystique surrounding the Stones like there is with the Beatles.
And I also believe that, while the Beatles relied mainly on talent, the Stones relied mostly on image. It's no contest as far as I'm concerned.

[MERIT] 12-14-2006 10:38 PM

Beatles. Thats not even a contest.

Spike*Spiegel 12-14-2006 10:45 PM

pshhh ok oojay what makes them so phenominal

[MERIT] 12-14-2006 10:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Spike*Spiegel (Post 311946)
pshhh ok oojay what makes them so phenominal

oh, i dunno. ever hear of the british invasion? revolutionizing the american rock n roll world forever maybe? what did the stones do? have big lips and do farewell tours since the 80's?

Merkaba 12-14-2006 10:51 PM

Hello? The Stones were a part of the British Invasion.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:52 AM.


© 2003-2024 Advameg, Inc.