Music Banter - Search Results Music Banter

Go Back   Music Banter > Search Forums
Reload this Page Search Results
Register Blogging Today's Posts
Welcome to Music Banter Forum! Make sure to register - it's free and very quick! You have to register before you can post and participate in our discussions with over 70,000 other registered members. After you create your free account, you will be able to customize many options, you will have the full access to over 1,100,000 posts.

Showing results 1 to 16 of 16
Search took 0.00 seconds. Search: Posts Made By: Rainard Jalen
Forum: Rock N Roll, Classic Rock & 60s Rock 11-02-2008, 04:30 AM
Replies: 844
Views: 143,586
Posted By Rainard Jalen
what do you mean exactly by "more diverse"? i am...

what do you mean exactly by "more diverse"? i am curious. I cannot see how that could be the case.
Forum: Rock N Roll, Classic Rock & 60s Rock 10-08-2008, 01:33 AM
Replies: 844
Views: 143,586
Posted By Rainard Jalen
um, what does that actually mean?

um, what does that actually mean?
Forum: Rock N Roll, Classic Rock & 60s Rock 07-10-2008, 02:21 AM
Replies: 844
Views: 143,586
Posted By Rainard Jalen
lmao, so what the hell are you doing on an...

lmao, so what the hell are you doing on an *internet* discussions board, particularly one that is explicitly titled "music banter"?

If you don't want to have a discussion, that's fine with me....
Forum: Rock N Roll, Classic Rock & 60s Rock 07-08-2008, 10:06 PM
Replies: 844
Views: 143,586
Posted By Rainard Jalen
Um, ok. I was kinda expecting that: if all else...

Um, ok. I was kinda expecting that: if all else fails, just accuse other person of something randomly without explaining how or why or what that means. Good one! :thumb:
Forum: Rock N Roll, Classic Rock & 60s Rock 07-08-2008, 03:32 PM
Replies: 844
Views: 143,586
Posted By Rainard Jalen
Right, and you've been here to observe all that...

Right, and you've been here to observe all that for what, 3 days? Anyway, this is a message board, so that's kinda the whole point: be opinionated and speak your mind.

I will rarely "strike down"...
Forum: Rock N Roll, Classic Rock & 60s Rock 07-08-2008, 10:49 AM
Replies: 844
Views: 143,586
Posted By Rainard Jalen
What a load of needless triffling hyperbole. ...

What a load of needless triffling hyperbole.

Um, the hell? Good grief. If you can prove that Harrison was even half as dexterous on guitar as Richards, I'll be impressed. Barring that, your...
Forum: Rock N Roll, Classic Rock & 60s Rock 07-04-2008, 11:45 AM
Replies: 844
Views: 143,586
Posted By Rainard Jalen
This isn't true at all. The Stones' best albums...

This isn't true at all. The Stones' best albums are pretty much great through and through. Go listen to Aftermath, same year as Revolver.


Aside from that, as hard rock pioneers they actually...
Forum: Rock N Roll, Classic Rock & 60s Rock 07-04-2008, 11:03 AM
Replies: 844
Views: 143,586
Posted By Rainard Jalen
I can't imagine he was serious with that comment,...

I can't imagine he was serious with that comment, but it is possible to argue, tentatively, that the Stones were on the whole more innovative.
Forum: Rock N Roll, Classic Rock & 60s Rock 06-29-2008, 07:25 AM
Replies: 844
Views: 143,586
Posted By Rainard Jalen
To be honest though, the Beatles vs Rolling...

To be honest though, the Beatles vs Rolling Stones is a VERY bad comparison to make. REALLY bad. For starters, they're essentially not even of the same genre! And that goes for any given period of...
Forum: Rock N Roll, Classic Rock & 60s Rock 06-28-2008, 09:39 AM
Replies: 844
Views: 143,586
Posted By Rainard Jalen
Every aspect aside from two: dancing skills, and...

Every aspect aside from two: dancing skills, and innovation.

EDIT: You know what, screw that. The Beatles are better than the Stones in every single way. Listening to mis-steps from other great...
Forum: Rock N Roll, Classic Rock & 60s Rock 06-28-2008, 08:52 AM
Replies: 844
Views: 143,586
Posted By Rainard Jalen
It was not a write-off, but a caution. At any...

It was not a write-off, but a caution. At any rate, I've already said, no doubt Paul was a good bass player.
Forum: Rock N Roll, Classic Rock & 60s Rock 06-27-2008, 11:22 PM
Replies: 844
Views: 143,586
Posted By Rainard Jalen
You might be right, but most essentially: source...

You might be right, but most essentially: source please...


Hence why I called him a pretty decent bass player and not a brilliant one (since the most impressive lines seem to be post 66???).
...
Forum: Rock N Roll, Classic Rock & 60s Rock 06-27-2008, 02:09 PM
Replies: 844
Views: 143,586
Posted By Rainard Jalen
Paul's main skill is as a singer. He was a pretty...

Paul's main skill is as a singer. He was a pretty decent bass player though.

It is also important to avoid judging the Beatles' instrumental skills on the basis of the years where they were no...
Forum: Rock N Roll, Classic Rock & 60s Rock 06-27-2008, 02:55 AM
Replies: 844
Views: 143,586
Posted By Rainard Jalen
I definitely prefer the Beatles for the songs and...

I definitely prefer the Beatles for the songs and I prefer the type of music they played, but I have to give the Stones the nod here for their innovation.
Forum: Rock N Roll, Classic Rock & 60s Rock 01-16-2007, 10:18 AM
Replies: 844
Views: 143,586
Posted By Rainard Jalen
I don't think selling out necessarily indicates...

I don't think selling out necessarily indicates betraying your roots. For me, "selling out" in its real, unadulterated sense is the practise of making a record simply to capitalize on your...
Forum: Rock N Roll, Classic Rock & 60s Rock 01-11-2007, 03:23 AM
Replies: 844
Views: 143,586
Posted By Rainard Jalen
Stones were more *diverse* than the Beatles? Pfft...

Stones were more *diverse* than the Beatles? Pfft to you, sir.

At any rate, there's a perfect, perfect example of a post where somebody makes a statement about a band whose discography they...
Showing results 1 to 16 of 16

 
Forum Jump
Terms & Privacy - Contact Us - Music Banter - Archive - Top

© 2003-2024 Advameg, Inc.