Most overrated bands ever? - Music Banter Music Banter

Go Back   Music Banter > Archive > Thread Graveyard
Register Blogging Today's Posts
Welcome to Music Banter Forum! Make sure to register - it's free and very quick! You have to register before you can post and participate in our discussions with over 70,000 other registered members. After you create your free account, you will be able to customize many options, you will have the full access to over 1,100,000 posts.

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 12-06-2007, 11:21 PM   #1481 (permalink)
north american scum
 
Brock_West's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Texas
Posts: 158
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by lucylamppost View Post
The Beatles
their ratio of good to bad songs isn't too high percentage wise, they lacked the soul, style, and grit of The Rolling Stones, the were very formulated when writing their songs

If the Beatles played Wood stock would there performance been more noted on music terms (not on hype) Santana, the Who, Sly and Family Stone, ****, even CSNY or The Beatles?
Percentage wise I think they might just be on top. And the reason I love the Beatles so much is the HUGE RANGE of different musical styles they did. Can't really say the same for the Stones (which I am a big fan of anyway)

And I'm more of a studio album rather than live kind of guy so if a band isn't good live doesn't bother me at all. One reason The Beatles quit touring was because they couldn't hear themselves over the roar of the crowd.


*and to your "mechanical drummer" comment - why does everyone hate Ringo? Ringo was awesome. Just because he's not as good as Keith Moon or John Bonham doesn't mean he sucks.
But you're right, they didn't utilize Harrison enough.


OVERRATED: Nirvana, Tool, Bob Dylan (as a singer not a lyricist), The Clash, Elvis, Michael Jackson, U2, Sly and the Family Stone, Van Morrison, panic! at the disco, Korn, Queens of the Stone Age, Marilyn Manson, probably more...

Last edited by Brock_West; 12-06-2007 at 11:45 PM.
Brock_West is offline  
Old 12-06-2007, 11:26 PM   #1482 (permalink)
isfckingdead
 
sleepy jack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 18,967
Default

I don't really understand the Ringo hate either but it's useless trying to defend him because people have it ingrained in them he's a terrible drummer which i'll never understand. When i'm listening to the Beatles I never sit there and go "goddamn this terrible drumming really bothers me" I don't really notice it. Which is a good quality in a drummer, to just compliment and play the music. Hell that's a good quality in any musician. I can't tell you how many bands with "amazing drummers" i've heard, like Berserker for instance, who have drummers that showoff and it just sounds awful and out of place but everyones too busy freaking out about how fast that double bass is. So yeah I consider Ringo to be a better drummer than Joey Jordison.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by METALLICA89 View Post
Ive seen you on muiltipul forums saying Metallica and slayer are the worst **** you kid go suck your **** while you listen to your ****ing emo **** I bet you do listen to emo music
sleepy jack is offline  
Old 12-07-2007, 12:00 AM   #1483 (permalink)
north american scum
 
Brock_West's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Texas
Posts: 158
Default

I agree with everything you just said
Brock_West is offline  
Old 12-07-2007, 10:08 AM   #1484 (permalink)
The Sexual Intellectual
 
Urban Hat€monger ?'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Somewhere cooler than you
Posts: 18,605
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Brock_West View Post
And the reason I love the Beatles so much is the HUGE RANGE of different musical styles they did. Can't really say the same for the Stones (which I am a big fan of anyway)
Rock n Roll , Blues , Motown , Country , Soul , Funk , Gospel , R&B , Pop , Psychadelia , Reggae , Keith Richards even said punk inspired them.

I've never really understood this Stones didn't have a huge range arguement.
__________________



Urb's RYM Stuff

Most people sell their soul to the devil, but the devil sells his soul to Nick Cave.
Urban Hat€monger ? is offline  
Old 12-07-2007, 05:07 PM   #1485 (permalink)
isfckingdead
 
sleepy jack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 18,967
Default

To be honest i've never understood the Rolling Stones vs. the Beatles argument in general. I think there's other groups that are more comparable and even that had more of a rivalry going. Take the Beach Boys and the Beatles. No one ever compares them or puts them up against eachother but I think it would be a much more interesting debate and plausible comparison.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by METALLICA89 View Post
Ive seen you on muiltipul forums saying Metallica and slayer are the worst **** you kid go suck your **** while you listen to your ****ing emo **** I bet you do listen to emo music
sleepy jack is offline  
Old 12-07-2007, 09:25 PM   #1486 (permalink)
I'm a figure of forgotten
 
lucylamppost's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: canada
Posts: 349
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Crowquill View Post
To be honest i've never understood the Rolling Stones vs. the Beatles argument in general. I think there's other groups that are more comparable and even that had more of a rivalry going. Take the Beach Boys and the Beatles. No one ever compares them or puts them up against eachother but I think it would be a much more interesting debate and plausible comparison.

Its because the beatles and the stones were around at the same time
__________________

lucylamppost is offline  
Old 12-08-2007, 08:52 AM   #1487 (permalink)
Music Addict
 
Raw & Funky's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: X World
Posts: 45
Default

theres so many over rated bands out there, u cant jus pick one
Raw & Funky is offline  
Old 12-08-2007, 01:52 PM   #1488 (permalink)
isfckingdead
 
sleepy jack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 18,967
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by lucylamppost View Post
Its because the beatles and the stones were around at the same time
So? The Beatles and the Beach Boys were around at the same time too. There were plenty of artists around in the 60s that don't get compared anywhere near as much as these two do. The only pair I think that does get put up against eachother as much would be Hendrix and Page.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by METALLICA89 View Post
Ive seen you on muiltipul forums saying Metallica and slayer are the worst **** you kid go suck your **** while you listen to your ****ing emo **** I bet you do listen to emo music
sleepy jack is offline  
Old 12-08-2007, 02:09 PM   #1489 (permalink)
I'm a figure of forgotten
 
lucylamppost's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: canada
Posts: 349
Default

yeah I am not saying a point I am just telling you the reason why people always fight about which is better
__________________

lucylamppost is offline  
Old 12-10-2007, 10:23 AM   #1490 (permalink)
Groupie
 
awaywego!'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Canada
Posts: 32
Default

Good Charlotte, Green Day, Fall Out Boy, Coheed and Cambria, Gym Class Heroes, KoRn, Linkin Park, Nickelback, Panic! At The Disco, Fort Minor (If they're a band, more of a group though right?).
awaywego! is offline  
 


Similar Threads



© 2003-2024 Advameg, Inc.