|
|||||||
| Register | Blogging | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
Welcome to Music Banter Forum! Make sure to register - it's free and very quick! You have to register before you can post and participate in our discussions with over 25,000 other registered members. After you create your free account, you will be able to customize many options, you will have the full access to over 500,000 posts.![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 (permalink) |
|
Music Addict
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 66
|
I was talking on another site about Renaissance and how they were essentially Yes but with a female singer. The guys response was that he thought female singers were more aesthetically pleasing to the ear.
Hmmm... I wondered...there just might be something to that! But if that is true, then why don't we see more female lead singers? Obviously we have the Spears and Simpsons with their pop, but other than that, the music industry seems (it could be just me) to be over run by male singers! Well if female singers are more pleasing to the ear, you would think it would be the other way around...your thoughts!
__________________
Gotta admit that I'm a little bit confused Sometimes it seems to me as if I'm just being used... |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 (permalink) |
|
the songs are too weird!
|
Would I be wrong in thinking that women have less range than the more versatile male singers, in a pop/rock context?
Not sure if it's worth the comparison. All I know is that there there aren't enough decent female musician-***-role models in the mainstream these days, where are the Patti Smiths? The only ones I can think of are old news - PJ Harvey, Bjork, Kate Bush (Tori Amos was from one of her hairs, fact fans) blardy blah... I happen to thing Charlotte Hatherley is one of the finest songwriters out there right now, however. I'm her stalker. |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 (permalink) | |
|
Music Addict
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 66
|
Quote:
However, you could be on to something, a male can get very low and use his falcetto to get very high (to hit the note at least, it might not sound pretty). Girls can also get very high, higher than most males, but they probably can not get very low. So assuming a male and female both have, lets say, 20 notes in their range, the male's could be all over the staff, but the female might be restricted to the upper parts...but this is all hypothetical and probably has little science behind it :P
__________________
Gotta admit that I'm a little bit confused Sometimes it seems to me as if I'm just being used... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 (permalink) |
|
Holding Back The River
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Toronto
Posts: 247
|
I think personally, a singer is a singer. there are many female singers that i love, Adele, Feist, Yael Naim,Alison Sudol,Kianna Alarid, but the same can be said for men. I just think men are traditionally given more of a chance in mainstream, rock at least. RnB and hip hop on the other hand have many more female artist.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 (permalink) | |
|
SpacerockeR
|
Quote:
__________________
-
"A lot like lucid dreams... as different from normal dreams as they are from waking life." |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 (permalink) |
|
nothing
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: everywhere
Posts: 1,478
|
there's a simple reason why you don't see more female rock singers.
mainstream rock is still rooted in classic rock and most of the songs are about getting laid. classic rock started out being about rebellion, aggression, being decadent and dirty, coming from the wrong side of the tracks. it wasn't nice and flowery, and about getting in touch with their emotions. rock music is very much based around the cack, the guitar (being the predominant instrument) is an obvious phallic symbol. even as open and equal as our society likes to think it is, it still sounds offsetting to hear a woman being sexually aggressive as a front person in a rock band. even in genres where women are predominantly front and center they're generally passive in their sexuality, they act all coy and innocent, and assert themselves indirectly to draw attention. it's not always the case but more often than not it's how it works out. a passive front person for a rock band generally doesn't work nearly as well as an aggressive one. |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 (permalink) |
|
Reformed Jackass
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 3,726
|
Nah, in terms of the amount of notes someone can hit it's equal but men have superior range, literally without exception. Men can go deeper and have falsetto.
__________________
I loved you when you opened Like a lily to the heat. I´m just another snowman Standing in the rain and sleet, Who loved you with his frozen love His second-hand physique - With all he is, and all he was A thousand kisses deep. |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 (permalink) |
|
Music Addict
|
Yeah I think it's a case that female vocals maybe don't have the same range or deep quality that's needed for when trying to sing over a bass, guitar and drums.
Of female singers though, some female singer songwritersare my favourite singers. Lisa Hannigan that sings with Damien Rice has a fantastic voice. My favourite overall is Gemma Hayes. Her voice is incredible. YouTube - Gemma Hayes -Ran For Miles - Live At Abbey Road
__________________
Well I got this guitar and I learned how to make it talk |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|