Quote:
|
Originally Posted by IamAlejo
Because the US sat around and waited for the UN to give clearance. Honestly, the US gives the UN...what, like 75% of the money. So when we ask for UN backing on something and they don't give it, or sit on their ass about it, it doesn't go over to well. That's why the US just said no sir and decided to get things under way. And as of countries against it....well, most people have a strong idea why countries such as Russia were so strong against the war..
|
that's why i'm saying that the UN needs to be dismanteled, why hold up the pretence that you are making joint decisions when that's not happening, the UN should become a humanitarian organisation aimed at helping the poor, doing something about the AIDS situation in africa and help countries that have gone through a catastrophy like the tsunami....
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by IamAlejo
NATO was created as a defensive mechanism to communism and the Warsaw Pact. Neither of those are a threat anymore, which makes NATO not needed.
|
you don't think we need an organisation that will be ready to act in situations such as coos in west africa and darfur in sudan? and kosovo?you're right , we should just let america solve everything her own way.....