Quote:
Originally Posted by hip hop bunny hop
1) the second half of the song was interesting, but the first half was godawful. According to my math, this means the song was - at best - mediocre.
2)I've nothing against high production values in and of themselves, but I certainly don't view it as an asset of such value that it will elevate a **** band to a quality one.
|
What about the first half was godawful to you? And what, in your opinion, is an example of high production value used effectively?