Quote:
|
Originally Posted by draven
How many "good" albums did nirvana have in the 90s? The answer is TWO. Nevermind and inutero. So tell me again how they were bigger or better than gnr?
The fact that gnr only had two great albums in the 90s and that they were the biggest band shows how big they really were. No one could touch them in the early 90s.
Like I said gnr were bigger from the time frame of 90-93 then any band on that list was from the whole decade. Just because gnr broke up in 93 still does not mean they cannot be the biggest band of the 90s. Also Cobain offed himself in 1994 just one year after gnr broke up. So using that logic how can nirvana even be on the list since they were just around from 91-94? Its still a four year time frame for both bands.
|
And Nevermind and In Utero are not great?, are you kidding me?, Nevermind was one of the best selling albums of the 90s, and its impact and influence is still present today, can't say the same for UYI I and II, those albums are great, just not as great as Nevermind and In Utero, if this was the 80s we are talking about, then i would agree with you, GnR were greater than Nirvana during that era, AFD was miles better than Bleach, but in the 90s it was Nirvana, so what if Nirvana broke up in 94?, GnR might as well have, they haven't made a good studio album since the UYI albums, Spegetti Incident was mediocre at best and everything they have done since sucked ass, their live shows with buckethead were horrible, and we are still waiting for Chinese Democracy to come out, which will probably be in the year 3000 when Chinese Democracy has long since become a reality, and without any of the original GnR members involved except Axl, i seriously doubt it will live up to the hype.