Quote:
Originally Posted by Frownland
Go trot through my 1300 arguments explaining why in this thread: http://www.musicbanter.com/general-m...-what-not.html. The very basic answer is that the piece still relies on sound. It's a common misconception to refer to it as a "silent piece" since while the instruments are silent, the piece is not silent at all. Due to its sonic elements and the fact that it's intended to be music, then it is music. It has a value as performance art though, but the overarching field is music. |
If it's music then he should be able to perform it without an audience.
Also, since he can't why is he getting credit for the piece and not the people performing the music? F
ucking thief imo.