Quote:
Originally Posted by OccultHawk
I actually feel like Oasis were much more a product of the times and not in a good way like The Smiths who carved their space with pure originality. The Smiths defined and pioneered their sound. I say The Smiths hold up better, are far more timeless, and while maybe not on "the charts" Smithlike bands still end up on end of the year top 100 lists from sources like Pitchfork and Wire.
|
I agree. You can generally hear that the Smiths are older, but they invented something new and because of that they have aged better. Oasis revived old ideas and sounds, so their music gets a bit stale to me after a while.