Music Banter

Go Back   Music Banter > The Music Forums > Indie & Alternative
Register Blogging Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
Welcome to Music Banter Forum! Make sure to register - it's free and very quick! You have to register before you can post and participate in our discussions with over 70,000 other registered members. After you create your free account, you will be able to customize many options, you will have the full access to over 1,100,000 posts.

Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 09-02-2017, 05:19 PM   #11 (permalink)
Music Addict
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 552

Every Smiths songs are graved on the marble.
But who cares ?

Last edited by ikvat; 09-02-2017 at 05:25 PM.
ikvat is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-18-2017, 11:51 AM   #12 (permalink)
Join Date: Apr 2017
Posts: 4

Originally Posted by RJDG14 View Post
So out of Oasis (mid 90s) and The Smiths (mid 80s), would Oasis sound more dated compared with the current charts, or would The Smiths have sounded more dated 10 years ago compared with the charts of the mid 2000s? Obviously The Smiths sound older than Oasis, but I wonder because of the rapid changes to the charts in the past 10 years (you no longer get rock/indie in the charts), and the fact that bands such as Interpol (heavily influenced by Joy Division and 80s indie) were having hits in the mid 2000s.
Honestly I think Oasis sound older than The Smiths, and that doesn't mean they are better or worse for it. Just that Oasis' very simple sound (distorted power chord, basic rock n roll drum beats, bass playing root notes, pentatonic guitar solos) as well as their typical arrogant rock attitude fits in better with the rock of the seventies than it does in the nineties. Obviously youve got the whole Britpop thing but Oasis were far more traditional than the rest of the bands in that movement.
BeatlesPepper is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-09-2018, 12:35 AM   #13 (permalink)
Join Date: Nov 2018
Posts: 8

I think the Oasis stuff will stand up as less dated sounding. Someone mentioned the guitar sounds being very 80's on the smiths stuff i tend to agree
TheMint is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-09-2018, 09:55 AM   #14 (permalink)
old senile battleaxe
Marie Monday's Avatar
Join Date: Oct 2018
Location: Cute Post Malone's mom
Posts: 1,274

Originally Posted by OccultHawk View Post
I actually feel like Oasis were much more a product of the times and not in a good way like The Smiths who carved their space with pure originality. The Smiths defined and pioneered their sound. I say The Smiths hold up better, are far more timeless, and while maybe not on "the charts" Smithlike bands still end up on end of the year top 100 lists from sources like Pitchfork and Wire.
I agree. You can generally hear that the Smiths are older, but they invented something new and because of that they have aged better. Oasis revived old ideas and sounds, so their music gets a bit stale to me after a while.

Originally Posted by Trollheart View Post
You sound like Buffy after they dragged her back from Heaven.
Originally Posted by WWWP View Post
I want to open a school for MB's lost boys and teach them basic coping skills and build up their self esteem and strengthen their emotional intelligence and teach them about vegetables and institutionalized racism and sexism and then they'll all build a bronze statue of me in my honor and my bronzed titties will forever be groped by the grubby paws of you ****ing whiny pathetic white boys.
Marie Monday is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-06-2018, 02:11 AM   #15 (permalink)
Music Addict
Karengirl's Avatar
Join Date: Dec 2018
Location: U.S.
Posts: 109

I think Oasis would sound more dated now than The Smiths would have 10 years ago or than The Smiths would sound now. Oasis mimicked classic rock with a huge, bombastic sound (I am a fan) + they left out all those long jam sessions mid-song. They wore their influences on their sleeves, while The Smiths created a sound. While Oasis may have encouraged many to pick up guitars, The Smiths influences can be heard in both Interpol and The Editors, and I'm sure countless others 10 years ago and now.

Last edited by Karengirl; 12-06-2018 at 02:21 AM. Reason: Deleted a sentence.
Karengirl is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-11-2019, 08:07 PM   #16 (permalink)
Join Date: Feb 2019
Posts: 6

I don't think there's much comparison between these two bands. Oasis has a few hits that have stood the test of time but the Smiths just seem to get better with age. The Smiths were pioneers and their sound is unique. The Smiths are simply amazing.
NeverStop is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-16-2019, 01:32 AM   #17 (permalink)
Music Addict
Shadou Dan's Avatar
Join Date: Jul 2016
Posts: 98

Idk who would be more dated by today's standards, but The Smiths were definitely more original.
Shadou Dan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-30-2019, 12:47 PM   #18 (permalink)
Join Date: Dec 2016
Posts: 16

Both bands are the hot fire!
RickySmith is offline   Reply With Quote

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Similar Threads

© 2003-2020 Advameg, Inc.