Quote:
Originally Posted by SoundgardenRocks
I'm sympathetic to those in tough spots financially, especially when kids are involved - a lot of people don't have it easy, and while I like appeal to emotion fallacies as much as the next guy, what's your argument?
That we increase the social safety net because some people are in a tough spot financially?
That we do away with bosses/CEOs (or reduce their pay) because some people are in a tough spot financially?
|
That if you are coerced out of your supposed freedom with the threat of becoming destitute then that freedom is an illusion.
And I say we cut their ****in' heads off btw.