Quote:
Originally Posted by Crowquill
No he's not, Clinton is the only one that takes money from lobbyists. Post some sources to this information, you're making things up.
|
erh, erh (buzzer sound) wrong again. I am operating on an idleaire computer, which plugs into truck, and won't allow me to open 2 window, thus won't allow me to provide links. However, if you do research on this subject, I'm sure you will find more than enough info. backing me up.
Quote:
|
I said cool for a republican, as in if I had to choose one out of the ones that appear to have a chance (Huckabee, Romney and Mccain) I'd probably go for him because of what he said about Falwell (who's a complete cock.) I never went on about agreeing with his beliefs.
|
Yeah, Falwell
wasa jerk, and I'm glad you've decided to go along with the idea of 'better of 2 evils' as sad of a reality as it is. With that said, it appears as though you would vote for McCain over Hilary. I guess hating a homophobic evangelist is much higher on your agenda than establishing peaceful relationships with other countries.
Quote:
|
No and he isn't even in the race anymore.
|
That doesn't mean he can't run as an independent.
Quote:
|
No and see I respect Obama because he's at least stuck to his opinion, one I agree with, Hillary is going to flip-flop to whatever the people filling her pockets say.
|
touche, but I doubt she's as bad as anyone else.
Quote:
|
Hillary is much more of a greedy war mongerer than Obama. This is complete contradictory to what you said earlier, you said she was honest, the people's pick, someone you could trust and could take criticism which is bullshit. I'll quote someone now who has much more insight into the Clintons than you do: "It's not a very big thing to say, "I made a mistake" on the war, and typical of Hillary Clinton that she can't. She's so advised by so many smart advisers who are covering every base. I think that America was better served when the candidates were chosen in smoke-filled rooms."
|
I never said people's pick, yes, she can take criticism. She calmly asserts her philosophy on the war without getting defensive. I was just wondering do you watch the debates, or just read nasty stuff about her on the interweb? Don't act like she's the one that got us into the war. Like I said earlier, she always tells the story the same, and does admit that she made a mistake. Somehow, you've confused her with Bush. Clearly, any candidate we put in there is going to be more or less the same, and so I agree with Obama that it is us, the people of America, who need to change this country. I would however like to see either a black person or a woman elected, just so maybe it would cut down on some of the racism or sexism.
*Enter comment by someone engaged with one line in that whole statement*:
oh, you think we should vote someone in just because they're black, or they're a woman? That's stupid.
No, but in this case, I feel good about both of those candidates. For anyone who thinks there's a big difference in Democrats and Republicans, you're just plain wrong. They're basically the same, minus a few ideological differences. If it's going to be all the same, no matter who we put in there, I would love to see a minority or woman. You don't see the kind of racism, and sh*t that I do on a daily basis, so I feel I'm entitled.
*Enter another dumb comment*
You're so anti-anti-affirmative action Used2lguy, and anti-anti-anti-sexist, it makes me sick.