no. most on my argument is based on the idea that people go into business to make money and nirvana really never looked like money until smells like teen spirit. i know they have to front like the money doesn't come first but there's no such thing as a successful business that doesn't generate revenue. that's why i'm not touching my personal tastes or feelings for nirvana into this offshoot from the main topic. i like how you went personal first
and none of the band UH listed aside from alice in chains even came close to generating the return nirvana did. how long did those bands last on major labels? did they all manage to release a full length before getting dropped?