Music Banter - View Single Post - Unpopular Music Opinions
View Single Post
Old 05-11-2008, 04:15 PM   #1061 (permalink)
Oomph!
Account Disabled
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Watertown, NY
Posts: 240
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Urban Hatemonger View Post
All i've asked him to do (about 7 times now ) is give a straight answer to some examples of bands Godsmack have influenced and ask him to show how they've changed music , which shouldn't be too difficult when he's saying they're better than the most influential band of the 20th century.
Popularity/influence doesn't make them not lame, and Godsmack's lack of relative influence compared to the Beatles doesn't make them 'lame'

This isn't a popularity contest, we all know how goddamned popular the Beatles were but's irrelevent.

Quote:
Originally Posted by KeithMoon2112 View Post
Why are you trying to compare the Beatles, a band in the sixties whose fanbase was more or less screaming teenage girls, with Godsmack, a hard rock band who claims Alice in Chains as one of their inspirations?
I'm not the one who brought Godsmack up in this thread, the ones who are trying to defend the Beatles brought up Godsmack to change the subject and distract everyone from the painfully obvious fact that the Beatles, regardless of how popular they were, were a lame, fruity pop band.
Oomph! is offline   Reply With Quote