Quote:
Originally Posted by lucifer_sam
...
Sorry. I assumed you were talking about art rock, which actually exists. But if you're the person defining the genre, you can claim whatever the fuck you want, huh? Not really much sense arguing.
Shenanigans.
|
If that's the case you were REALLY off base via The Velvet Underground reference.
Friend, lets bring this full circle to a common ground of intelligent conversation. I took the time to
defined clearly what I was referring to via the jargon I used. Maybe that's a misconception on my behalf. I will give you that much. But if all you can do as a music appreciator is be short, sarcastic and withdrawn, how could I possibly see the matter through your ears so to speak?
I have been searching and searching for an enthusiastic and INTELLIGENT music appreciation community. You wanna know what the two biggest draw backs that have hindered that process so far are? <whether you do or don't>
Those two specific handicaps are comprised of age differences (most people under 18 live to insult themselves on message boards, not all though.) and cliques. Thankfully I haven't got a strong whiff of either here yet.
If you REALLY care about music AND communication, you'll avoid dismissive one sentence remarks that attempt to justify your brevity and take the time to honestly spell yourself out intelligently.
What the hell else is personal passion/special interest based discussion for?
Quote:
Originally Posted by boo boo
I f*cking hate it when people argue over weither or not a band is part of a genre they just made up.
|
Might try actually defending your position there boo boo.
Quote:
Originally Posted by ProggyMan
Wtf was that? How are Radiohead safe/pedestrian? They certainly take risks, and they don't really sound like any other band ever...
|
No edge for me friend. Little groove and very minimal. Lame IMO. About as energetic as a boiled cabbage.