Quote:
Originally Posted by JayJamJah
Religious nuts have tried to interpret their way out of the bibles horrible historical inaccuracies and it's awful sexist, hateful and homophobic passages, but in the end it is what it is, a fictional book written by a bunch of narcissistic sociopaths who lived in a cruel, barbaric and ****ed up world. End of story.
|
Well said.
Quote:
Originally Posted by WendyCal
Do i really have to explain to you that sex was supposed to be for procreation, and that we, like, 'fit together' a certain way to make that happen?
|
Then obviously you are against people marrying and having sex if:
1. At least one partner is infertile
2. At least one partner is too old to have children
3. The couple decides to
not have children
...and who are you to say what people should do with their bodies? There are homosexual animals out there, which deflates the whole "Natural or not" argument.
Quote:
Originally Posted by WendyCal
Let me ask you something ~ why shouldn't creationism be taught? It’s the only other theory out there, if you also discount Intelligent Design. Just think of it as Anthropology.
|
Oh jeeze...how can it be any plainer?
Creationism is not science. Therefore it should not be taught in
science class.