Originally Posted by thegoldlaw

The problem doesnt lie with the BCS, the problem lies with tiebreakers. The Tiebreaker games should only take into account #2-#3 and possibly #4 if needed. If texas were to play Okla on a tie breaker game and the winner of that played florida you'd have almost no one complaining except maybe boise st and USC (Has no grounds, hasnt beat anyone). The only reason why boise st didnt make it is because of hawaii. When hawaii played georgia it was the lowest rated BCS bowl ever and hawaii just stunk it up. I know the arguement is going to be, well Boise St is good they beat Oklahoma. They won it on 2 fluke plays and the ratings of the game was almost as bad as the hawaii game.