Quote:
|
We all saw what happened when Oklahoma had 2 weeks to prepare for tech tx. If Texas had the same amount of time for tech texas it would have been the same result (Texas winning by 30+). As it was Texas had 3 hard weeks in a row and THEN had a short week vs Texas tech and lost on the last play of the game. Also could have won it prior if Gidian would have caught the INT.
|
Er ok, don't know who this is directed at.
Quote:
|
How you can argue USC having a good schedule is beyond me. In the Pac 10 there is only 1 team with 10 wins. In the big 12 you have 3, SEC you have 2. Doesn't hurt Pac 10 is the ONLY conference with a winless team. I don't know where your sick bias for the pac 10/USC deleloped but I'd love to know where this blindless faith came from.
|
Texas Tech is overrated, if they'd played anyone out of conference they'd be exposed. Harrell is a product of the system and the biggest offensive line in College Football. They shouldn't be in the top 10. But anyways, the Pac-10 isn't as good as either the SEC or Big 12 this year, but USC still has played a decent schedule and beaten several solid teams in conference. Just because the Pac-10 is down doesn't mean USC is, they have the best defense in the country by far and a solid, balanced offense. The Big 12 hasn't done anything to prove themselves out of conference, neither has the SEC (Which has the same amount of good teams as the Pac-10). USC dominated the only 10 win team they played, which you discount because you say they haven't shown up in their two big games this year. Which is bull**** because one of those games was lost on a freshman mistake by 7 points, the other being the game against USC. I'm not going to argue that the Pac-10 is better than the SEC/Big 12, but the gap is closer than you'd like to believe and USC is just as good as any team in the country. Oregon is just as good as Texas Tech and Oklahoma State, Cal is almost as good, Oregon State is about the same.