Music Banter - View Single Post - Artists or Entertainers?
View Single Post
Old 01-20-2009, 06:47 PM   #37 (permalink)
Molecules
daddy don't
 
Molecules's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: the Wastes
Posts: 2,577
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Automatic Slim View Post
Actually, I come down more on the side of musicians who consider themselves primarily 'entertainers'. There is little honor in being a 'starving artist'.

I'm also coming at this issue from the standpoint of a graphic artist (who finally got a real job) who has debated similar topics with artists who think that 'art' is all-important, and think 'the public be damned'.
i'll bang on about artistic integrity all night but f*ck me if i'd ever try and make a living off of it. At the end of the day be it art or entertainment it still has to go through the same system, 'it' is a product in demand and supply needs to be met. And the artists you talk to sound like c*nts, art should be for everybody, and if 'everybody' is too dense (through years of morning radio and tv propaganda) to interpret somebody else's art then that's a few less jumped-up armchair critics in the world.
__________________

[SIZE="1"]Eff em
tumble her
Molecules is offline   Reply With Quote