This was me working on repetition, but I also wanted to squeeze some philosophy into it. Obviously, this one was an expiriment:
Wrong (Right)
If man’s morals are justified,
than how do we interpret our wrongs
if we can only think alongside
the lines of our replaceable songs
Wrong wouldn’t be wrong and wronging
someone else would be ethical
because we decide our prize ring
held up by our very low morale
Why is there chaos when the definition is lost
Why is there chaos when the line is crossed
Why is there chaos when the rules are tossed
losing that line comes at a terrible cost
So if there is a defined law
that says “Murder is very Wrong”
written by one without flaw
How do we know he’s not wrong?
He might not do wrong to his
standard, but he might be wrong
by the 5th dimension which does
not approve with his right and wrong
In fact, his definition of
wrong could be wrong simply
by virtue of the fact thereof
that defining morals isn’t free
So, If I can’t demarcate right
why does it feel right to define
what is wrong? Why is there height
on the right walls of malign
Why is there chaos when the definition is lost
Why is there chaos when the line is crossed
Why is there chaos when the rules are tossed
losing that line comes at a terrible cost
|