Quote:
Originally Posted by mr dave
like every other religious 'debate' i've ever seen it still boils down to a very simple premise.
do you choose to believe in something or do you choose to believe in nothing.
whichever side of that divide you choose to be on is irrelevant, as neither can be infallibly proven; being able to accept your decision without the burden of proof while respecting another individual's choice to hold an opposing view is.
that last bit seems to be the biggest challenge to most of the biggest 'thinkers' i've ever had to deal with.
|
Well I understand there are morally no problems with believing in God or not believing in God. I agree with the agnostic point of view but I also think people should try to use raw logic to question their own beliefs, sometimes people are so driven by the communal and the unproven benefits they treat their beliefs as fact. Also the list is really referring to a Christian God, I really should have pointed that out.