Mild or not, I can still see the point, and i agree fullheartedly (somehow this word is wrong). If the innovators are less talented than the newer generations, then they shouldn't get the credit of being the best just for being the original. They should get thanks for their pioneering, but that doesn't automatically give them entitlement to being the best there is.
However, if you do find the earlier forms to be better just because you find more talent/heart/whatever in them, then i say the argument doesn't really apply.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by WhateverDude
Laser beams, psychedelic hats, and for some reason kittens. Surrel reminds me of kittens.
|
^if you wanna know perfection that's it, you dumb shits
|