Don't we already have a good idea what everyone's rep is? Then again, our "forum awards" looked more like the Grammy's.

are you implying the votes were fixed??!! i won dammit!!! i won fair and square!!!!

I vote no for the reasons given.

we are not all a happy family here.

Yes we are...

http://www.sgxplorer.com/images/avat...c6c3a610a1.gif

HAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!

on that note, this year (awards to be presented June 25th) I'm setting up something different, so it's more open. No worries!

i'm not sure i'm following, you're saying that it would be abused? how so? i think i explained to ethan that the chances of that happening are slim....besides, the admin can give more rep power to those who have been here longer and already have somewhat of a good reputation, and as far as i know, none of those people are childish or retarded.....

^ It would be abused. Simply think logically about it. We have roughly 20-30 regular regulars. And almost half of aren't exactly non-abrasive. It would be abused. Plain and simple. Plus, if you saw someone's post that had a low reputation level you'd already be biased of the post (speaking from a newbies perspective) it's better not to have it IMO.

em yeah ian, you've made no argument what so ever.....simply saying that it will be abused is no argument...the majority of the regular posters here are not idiots or 9....and no you wouldn't be biased of the post if someone had a low reputation score....

*sigh*

fuck me for trying to add something new here.....

I just wish people would be more honest & just say no because it involves more work

it involves clicking a few buttons for one the admins.

and adidasss, I did provide an arguement...I'm so confused.


if a majority of people want it than fine, PM gregb or IAmAlego about it. But I call right now that it will simply start more flaming.