Just because you wrongly infer something does not make it a fact with which you should use to build an argument upon.

Look how I did it and then look how you did it.

Then hopefully a little lightbulb will go on above your head & you'll understand why your 'opinions' are infraction worthy.

Probably good to follow your own advice

What is the difference? What you just said about Vanilla is more insulting than what I said to get an infraction. Will you get one? No. Did I? Yes. That's the difference.

Honestly, it's like teaching a man with no legs to do the Can-Can.

I give up.

Get off the cross Urban. You're sticking your nose in other peoples' conversations and then throwing up your hands in digust when no one cares about your point of view that they didn't ask for in the first place. Being an ex-mod doesn't make your opinion any more valid or needed than anyone else's.

Too many people on here use the pseudo-third person perspective of other like-mided individuals to try to justify their skewed frames of mind.

Oojay, I too do find you to generally be pretty aggressive. Even though I didn't see your offending post, I'm not surprised you got an infraction.

Please don't use religious metaphors I find them offensive.

I was referring to a completely different cross, one more closely resembling the one Paloma posted a picture of in a different thread.

This thread is dry... Needs music:



Please, can these arguments that are about literally nothing of any substance stop... please...