Community Feedback Poll [read clarifications in OP before voting!]

djchameleon · 06-13-2011, 08:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Freebase Dali

Care to explain that comment?
Just wondering, because I don't see any irony. He basically admits this is the first time he's had such praise. He's not denying it.

Nope, not explaining it. I like to use words incorrectly because I'm dumb.

Freebase Dali · 06-13-2011, 08:33 PM

Also, I want to clarify the following option:
Members SHOULD NOT be allowed to break any rules, at any time.

What I meant by this, is a matter of tolerating occasions where a member may break a rule but as a one time thing... should that member be punished rather than given a nudge of disapproval. I'll make a list of clarifications in the original post before too many others vote, so that no one is inadvertently mislead. I apologize for any ambiguity that may have caused votes that may not have been intended for the clarification of those rules.

djchameleon · 06-13-2011, 08:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Freebase Dali

Also, I want to clarify the following option:
Members SHOULD NOT be allowed to break any rules, at any time.

What I meant by this, is a matter of tolerating occasions where a member may break a rule but as a one time thing... should that member be punished rather than given a nudge of disapproval. I'll make a list of clarifications in the original post before too many others vote, so that no one is inadvertently mislead. I apologize for any ambiguity that may have caused votes that may not have been intended for the clarification of those rules.

okay got ya, I should have just asked but I got it now.

We aren't allowed to insult ourselves.

Paedantic Basterd · 06-13-2011, 08:39 PM

For the record, I'd have cast slightly differently, given that information.

Freebase Dali · 06-13-2011, 08:55 PM

I'm in the process of adding clarifications now. Due to the character limitations for options, I guess it was inevitable there would be some ambiguity. For those that wish to change their votes after the clarifications are posted, just post those votes you made that you wish to change, and which you'd like to change them to. It will just be an issue to get others who've voted on them to re-vote those options, if desired.

Paedantic Basterd · 06-13-2011, 08:56 PM

I'll edit in my own addendum, of which there are two.

Freebase Dali · 06-13-2011, 09:11 PM

Clarifications posted in OP.

Freebase Dali · 06-13-2011, 09:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pedestrian

I'll edit in my own addendum, of which there are two.

I'm not sure how to go about that without erasing the option and creating a new duplicate that no one has voted, as your name wouldn't be erased from the vote by simply subtracting one from the vote box. If that's the only way, then those who have voted on the option will have to re-vote on the new version of it if they wish to keep their vote. Same would go for the options that are being switched to.

I could be wrong though. I've never tried it.

Paedantic Basterd · 06-13-2011, 09:18 PM

It moves the vote, but not the name. Oh well.

Freebase Dali · 06-13-2011, 09:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pedestrian

It moves the vote, but not the name. Oh well.

Yea, it's not an issue. Just seeing the name in both opposing votes is enough.

View Poll Results: Select each option that you agree with
Moderators SHOULD use personal judgment in moderating decisions.	20	66.67%
Moderators SHOULD NOT use personal judgment in moderating decisions, and refer to strict rules only.	5	16.67%
Members SHOULD be allowed to break rules, provided they are not habitually doing so.	16	53.33%
Members SHOULD NOT be allowed to break any rules, at any time.	10	33.33%
Moderators SHOULD take history and frequency into account, when infracting.	24	80.00%
Moderators SHOULD NOT take history and frequency into account, when infracting.	3	10.00%
Moderators SHOULD publically post a member's infraction and/or ban information.	13	43.33%
Moderators SHOULD NOT publically post a member's infraction and/or ban information.	12	40.00%
Members SHOULD PM a moderator for questions regarding such information.	19	63.33%
Members SHOULD NOT PM a moderator for that information, but ask publicly.	6	20.00%
Moderators should have to justify ALL of their decisions.	14	46.67%
Moderators should have to justify SOME of their decisions.	12	40.00%
Moderators should not have to justify ANY of their decisions.	2	6.67%
Members should be given a LIMITED number of chances to cease disruptive activity.	28	93.33%
Members should be given UNLIMITED chances to cease disruptive activity.	1	3.33%
Moderators SHOULD be allowed to decide what constitutes disruption.	22	73.33%
Moderators SHOULD NOT be allowed to decide what constitutes disruption.	2	6.67%
The "Why Someone Is Banned" thread should be CLOSED.	10	33.33%
The "Why Someone Is Banned" thread should remain OPEN.	17	56.67%
Actions going against rules SHOULD be allowed in specific threads designed for these activities.	20	66.67%
Actions going against rules SHOULD NOT be allowed in specific threads designed for these activities.	4	13.33%
Complaints against moderation should be taken up in PM	17	56.67%
Complaints against moderation should be posted PUBLICLY.	13	43.33%
In order for everyone to be treated equally, moderation must be black & white.	3	10.00%
Black & white moderation will lead to an unhappy community afraid of expressing themselves.	19	63.33%
Community majority opinion on these matters SHOULD dictate future activities.	22	73.33%
Community majority opinion on these matters SHOULD NOT dictate future activities	3	10.00%
Moderator majority opinion on these matters should dictate future activity.	10	33.33%
Multiple Choice Poll. Voters: 30. You may not vote on this poll

06-13-2011, 08:33 PM	#12 (permalink)
Freebase Dali Partying on the inside Join Date: Mar 2009 Posts: 5,584	Also, I want to clarify the following option: Members SHOULD NOT be allowed to break any rules, at any time. What I meant by this, is a matter of tolerating occasions where a member may break a rule but as a one time thing... should that member be punished rather than given a nudge of disapproval. I'll make a list of clarifications in the original post before too many others vote, so that no one is inadvertently mislead. I apologize for any ambiguity that may have caused votes that may not have been intended for the clarification of those rules.

06-13-2011, 08:39 PM	#14 (permalink)
Paedantic Basterd Music Addict Join Date: Sep 2010 Posts: 5,184	For the record, I'd have cast slightly differently, given that information.

06-13-2011, 08:55 PM	#15 (permalink)
Freebase Dali Partying on the inside Join Date: Mar 2009 Posts: 5,584	I'm in the process of adding clarifications now. Due to the character limitations for options, I guess it was inevitable there would be some ambiguity. For those that wish to change their votes after the clarifications are posted, just post those votes you made that you wish to change, and which you'd like to change them to. It will just be an issue to get others who've voted on them to re-vote those options, if desired.

06-13-2011, 08:56 PM	#16 (permalink)
Paedantic Basterd Music Addict Join Date: Sep 2010 Posts: 5,184	I'll edit in my own addendum, of which there are two.

06-13-2011, 09:11 PM	#17 (permalink)
Freebase Dali Partying on the inside Join Date: Mar 2009 Posts: 5,584	Clarifications posted in OP.

06-13-2011, 09:18 PM	#19 (permalink)
Paedantic Basterd Music Addict Join Date: Sep 2010 Posts: 5,184	It moves the vote, but not the name. Oh well.