|
Register | Blogging | Today's Posts | Search |
View Poll Results: Which statements do you agree the most with? (public poll) | |||
1A. The rules should be applied equally to all members (ex. rules apply equally to mods and users) |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
15 | 60.00% |
1B. The rules should NOT be applied equally to all members (ex. mods more lenient with regualrs) |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
8 | 32.00% |
2A. Rules should apply equally to all forums |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
7 | 28.00% |
2B. Rules should NOT apply equally to all forums (ex. "Safe Zones" less strict) |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
18 | 72.00% |
3A. Outside safe zones, mod policy should allow for short, nonsense posts |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
10 | 40.00% |
3B. Outside safe zones, mod policy should discourage short, nonsense posts |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
13 | 52.00% |
3C. Outside safe zones, mod policy should prohibit short, nonsense posts |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
2 | 8.00% |
4A. General mod policy should be to react to every instance where a rule is broken |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
10 | 40.00% |
4B. General mod policy should allow for mods NOT to react to an instance where a rule is broken |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
15 | 60.00% |
5A. Details of rule enforcement is ultimately between a mod and a user |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
7 | 28.00% |
5B. Details of rule enforcement can ulimately be subject to other mods scrutiny |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
4 | 16.00% |
5C. Details of rule enforcement can be subject to public scrutiny |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
16 | 64.00% |
6A. For punishment, there should be a general policy to use temporary infractions |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
5 | 20.00% |
6B. For punishment, there should be a general policy to use warnings, infractions / bans |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
16 | 64.00% |
6C. There should be no general policy for how punishment is carried out |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
7 | 28.00% |
7A. For rule enforcement, moderators should use a joint, anonymous account |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
4 | 16.00% |
7B. For rule enforcement, moderators should use their personal accounts |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
21 | 84.00% |
8A. A new moderation policy should have a trial run first (ex. 1 - 2 months) |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
18 | 72.00% |
8B. A new moderation policy should NOT have a trial run first (implemented immediately) |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
5 | 20.00% |
9A. The mod team should be bolstered with additional mods. |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
13 | 52.00% |
9B. The mod team should NOT be bolstered with additional mods. |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
6 | 24.00% |
9C. The current mod team should be retained. |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
17 | 68.00% |
9D. Some or all of the current moderators should be replaced. |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
6 | 24.00% |
10. Some of my concerns are not listed in the individual items, but I will voice them in a reply. |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
5 | 20.00% |
Multiple Choice Poll. Voters: 25. You may not vote on this poll |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
![]() |
#3 (permalink) |
Fck Ths Thngs
Join Date: May 2014
Location: NJ
Posts: 6,261
|
![]()
I said it earlier. I think at the very least the mod list should be cleaned up, as far as I'm concerned there are only a few mods: Janz, Goof, Pete, FB, Nilla, Yac. Pete and FB come and go but they have been pretty active recently which is nice. Yac might as well not even be on the list with his lack of presence, and Vanilla needs to get her ass back here.
Do Jans and Goof get a lot of help behind the scenes? ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 (permalink) | |
Juicious Maximus III
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Scabb Island
Posts: 6,525
|
![]()
It's posts like this that I find really cheapen the whole of MB wherever they appear. Vegangelica here gives a well formulated, researched, thought out post which brings up a lot of good, relevant points about the going ons here. This is met with ridicule of which the overall message seems to be don't bother, we are MB and we don't care about your posts or your opinions so you might as well keep quiet.
Earlier, I thought people did this basically out of moral laziness. If you haven't reflected much on what it is you bring to a community and haven't really thought about what you want your overall influence on a site to be, you might give some one day and take some the other. It's not really mean, more a sort of neutral by posting something nice one day and something bad the other. However, I have come to understand that the above is actually what the most active posters want from the site. It is not simply a matter of laziness. The voice of MB, the collective message of the people who post the most, will attempt to alienate any true effort, even one made in its best interest. It will use posts like the one above to try to quiet opinions and it does so relentlessly, hoping to tire people out or at least drown out their voices. You're basically telling us over and over again that you and MB are not worth the effort. Well done, I get the message now and I believe you. Quote:
Still, when I made my earlier suggestion, I hoped that the current moderators would be able to adapt to a new policy. Under the suggestion I proposed, with moderators being treated to the same rules, I would hope that those who could not adapt would eventually get weeded out.
__________________
Something Completely Different |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#5 (permalink) | ||
Zum Henker Defätist!!
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Beating GNR at DDR and keying Axl's new car
Posts: 48,199
|
![]() Quote:
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
__________________
Quote:
|
||
![]() |
![]() |
#6 (permalink) | |
Mate, Spawn & Die
Join Date: May 2007
Location: The Rapping Community
Posts: 24,593
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
|