Originally Posted by Neapolitan I already have the grammar police after me for butchering the English language.

Originally Posted by Plankton .

Originally Posted by Lisnaholic Grammatically, a fullstop is used to finish a sentence. It should not be used in isolation when there is nothing to be stopped. *posts Grammar Police GIF*

Originally Posted by mord Actually, I like you a lot, Nea. That's why I treat you like ****. It's the MB way.

"it counts in our hearts" ?ºº?
“I have nothing to offer anybody, except my own confusion.” Jack Kerouac.
“If one listens to the wrong kind of music, he will become the wrong kind of person.” Aristotle.
"If you tried to give Rock and Roll another name, you might call it 'Chuck Berry'." John Lennon
"I look for ambiguity when I'm writing because life is ambiguous." Keith Richards

Originally Posted by Neapolitan I think in Plankton's usage, it' not actually a full stop. It is commonly used as "point" as in point well taken, that's the point, or in case in point.

Originally Posted by Lisnaholic I like your new "Plankton is watching you" avatar, Plankton! ^ Yeah, I've never quite worked out exactly what it means; some people seem to use it to mean "I agree completely" - or maybe they' re saying "that's a good point." Is it just an MB thing, or is it used on other forums?

Originally Posted by grindy I assume it indicates that some retort or argument made is so good and poignant, that it ends the discussion and nothing further can or should be added. This resolution is signified by the period. As if the whole argument was a sentence which is being finalized.

Originally Posted by J.R.R. Tolkien There is only one bright spot and that is the growing habit of disgruntled men of dynamiting factories and power-stations; I hope that, encouraged now as ‘patriotism’, may remain a habit! But it won’t do any good, if it is not universal.