|
|||||||
| Register | Blogging | Today's Posts | Search |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
|
#1 (permalink) |
|
Groupie
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Aotearoa (NZ)
Posts: 4
|
Alright then, virtuosity, you say...
If you're after piano virtuosity, then I suggest C.V Alkan. His works contain some of the most death-defying runs (On par with many of Liszt's works) I've had the chance to come into contact with. His metronome marks are often ridiculously fast, and they contain a lot of musical interest (in my opinion). Although they may not be the most beautiful or melodic pieces, give them a try at least. Some of his music will require a second listen (But nowhere near some other pieces I've heard). As for other recommendations of composers; Balakirev - Islamey. It has a lot of argument over whether or not it's just a showpiece, but it's so difficult that Scriabin (who came second is his performance class only to Rachmaninoff himself) stuffed his right hand learning it. Prokofiev - Piano Concerto [Insert number here]. I never realized half of the stuff he wrote was actually possible until I saw videos of them. My personal favourite is the 2nd concerto. His etudes, op.2. Worth a listen, but I'm not too sure if you'll like them. Ravel - If you're after virtuosity, then take a look at the Miroirs, and Gaspard de la Nuit. The latter one was written to be harder than Balakirev's Islamey, so good if you're after a challange (as is the former one). Scriabin - Sonata no. 9 and Vers la Flamme. Both creepily coloured pieces with a strong technique required. Tchaikovsky - The first from the 6 romances, op 16 (Berecuse). It doesn't have virtuosity, but it carries a brilliant melancholy melody over the top. |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 (permalink) |
|
Al Dente
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Texas
Posts: 4,847
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|