.

It doesn’t matter how the people of SF vote because voting is a worthless futile feel good gesture (of stupidity). They put into action the most discriminatory policies possible against the poor with their behavior especially concerning how they utilize private property. The city is completely closed off to the poor.

The people there are supposedly liberal but when you boil it down they’re heartless, elitist, capitalist bitches.

The mayor of Dallas is a Democrat.

But the point is taken that the places that pat themselves on the back the hardest for their humanitarianism don’t have anywhere for a poor man to ****.

Or sprawling suburban “cities” have more off the street places to poop than one of the most densely packed cities in the US.

Or... The business owners in SF keep the homeless locked out of their restrooms while catering to the organic gluten free non-gmo farm whatever locally raised dietary restrictions of a bunch of rich ****s.

Poor people lock people out too by threat of violence and theft. Come to NJ, I'll fill you up on Taco Bell and White Castle then drop you in the middle of Camden, let me know how you make out.

There are random parts of NJ where you stop at a local convenience store and they don't let you use the bathroom. I don't see what that has to do with the state itself.

Now I'm jonesing for some Taco Bell and White Castle at 6 a.m. Thanks.

There's places in Salt Lake where you have to be a customer to use the bathrooms because homeless people go in there to do drugs and ****.

There's also places that started putting spikes up in the windows so homeless people can't sleep there. Kinda like London.

What I said and what you said are not mutually exclusive.