This guy is one of the few people who could be considered a key witness for testimony and he says he wasn't there at all. He's not even one of the accused: what's his motive?
This guy is one of the few people who could be considered a key witness for testimony and he says he wasn't there at all. He's not even one of the accused: what's his motive?
Not being known as the dickhead who did nothing while a 15 year old girl was sexually assaulted.
This guy is one of the few people who could be considered a key witness for testimony and he says he wasn't there at all. He's not even one of the accused: what's his motive?
Your master-level lazy analysis is clearly bulletproof.
Anteater
09-19-2018 08:33 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by 66Sexy
(Post 1998447)
Your master-level lazy analysis is clearly bulletproof.
Feel free to refute it with something that isn't a disingenuous argument that presumes guilt. The burden of proof isn't on Kavanaugh: she has to provide corroborative evidence with consistent details. So far she's done a bad job at that. If she can pull it off, then he really will be derailed from the SCOTUS nomination process and everyone can pat themselves on the back. This isn't anything like Bill Cosby's case where there was an overwhelming amount of evidence that supported his accusers.
The Batlord
09-19-2018 08:42 PM
OH already did.
Anteater
09-19-2018 08:47 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by 66Sexy
(Post 1998451)
OH already did.
My response to you also applies to his comment.
Since it's unlikely that the FBI will do an investigation, if she doesn't show up on Monday then he's a done deal for SCOTUS. We'll just have to see what happens.
OccultHawk
09-19-2018 08:50 PM
He’s getting approved.
The Batlord
09-19-2018 08:53 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Anteater
(Post 1998452)
My response to you also applies to his comment.
Since it's unlikely that the FBI will do an investigation, if she doesn't show up on Monday then he's a done deal for SCOTUS. We'll just have to see what happens.
How can you demand a refutation of a refutation? You say dumb **** that doesn't require a whole paragraph.
Chula Vista
09-19-2018 09:02 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by 66Sexy
(Post 1998400)
Chula defends Page for raping a 14-year-old girl and Ant defends a judge for trying to rape another girl. They really are the same person.
Maddox was a willing participant. Page even asked her mom for her permission to have Lori accompany him on tour. And Maddox remembers it fondly.
:p::p::p::p::p:
Ant, this woman has a very successful career and is widely respected in her field. She had no reason to come forward other than her conscience.
Way different than the porn-stars and Playboy models that have accused Trump. And Judge doesn't want to testify because he's afraid of perjuring himself for lying, or not reporting the incident at the time.
Do you actually own a "It's the Victim's Fault" t-shirt?
