Music Banter - The Wow I Can't Believe That News Story Thread

Music Banter (https://www.musicbanter.com/)

- Current Events, Philosophy, & Religion (https://www.musicbanter.com/current-events-philosophy-religion/)

- - The Wow I Can't Believe That News Story Thread (https://www.musicbanter.com/current-events-philosophy-religion/30710-wow-i-cant-believe-news-story-thread.html)

Quote:

Originally Posted by 66Sexy (Post 1998510)

I agree he doesn't have ethics but I don't think he'd be able to keep his mouth shut about his brilliant political opinions long enough to fake being a liberal. I suspect it would be too grating to have everyone see him disagreeing with himself so profoundly especially since so much of politics is economics. Sure he's a born liar but his image isn't simply a fabrication, it's an exaggeration.

He used to be a Democrat and shilled for Hillary. His whole Obama birther propaganda was started so Hillary would beat him in the primaries. Turns out that Republicans latched onto it rather than the left.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Lucem Ferre (Post 1998511)

Lol I don't even remember that. I thought he was talking or insinuating about running for the Republican primary at the time.

I know there is video of Trump dropping out in the year 2000 and slamming the reform party for having David Duke join saying that having a bigot and a racist in your party is not a good thing.

Edit: And the reporter pointed out that he wasn't even on the ballot in NY and he quickly tells him that New York supported him greatly.

I'd like to see that video tbh. Not for any edification I just need the laugh.

Quote:

Originally Posted by 66Sexy (Post 1998515)

I'd like to see that video tbh. Not for any edification I just need the laugh.

If I can find the whole interview, I can find the part where he denounced David Duke since that's the important part because he tried to pretend he didn't know who he was when CNN brought up David Duke's support for him.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chula Vista (Post 1998334)

The GOP are going 120 MPH to get the guy on the bench. The same GOP who stalled Obama's supreme court nominee for over a year until after the 2016 election so that Trump could name the nominee he and the GOP wanted instead.

- After the anonymous letter was released, 65 women signed a letter on Kavanaughs behalf stating what a swell guy he is/was. After the accuser went public, 60 of them backed away and said they wouldn't testify under oath.

- The only other guy in the room during the alleged assault says he doesn't remember the incident and is also refusing to testify under oath. He's got a long history of misogynistic writings that have been dug up.

- The accuser passed a polygraph test administered by an ex-FBI officer.

- Both the accuser's therapist and husband will testify that she brought up the incident (but didn't name names) back in 2012 when they were in couples therapy.

- There's a video of Kavanaugh joking about his prep school that "what happened there, stayed there."

- The schools yearbook dedicated 2 pages with photos displaying how much of a party house the school was when Kavanaugh attended.

- The accuser wants the FBI to investigate her claim before she'll testify in front of the Senate. GOP says no and wants her to testify Monday. Note: It only took the FBI 3 days to investigate one of Anita Hill's claims about Clarence Thomas.

Think about it, if (when) Kavanaugh gets sworn in, the two most conservative members of the court will be guys who were accused of sexual assault and sexual harassment. The same guys who will be voting on women's rights issues as well as working towards overturning Roe v Wade.

What pisses me off is that the liberals waited until the last minute to introduce it, when they've "known about it" all along.

Quote:

Originally Posted by OccultHawk (Post 1998438)

Everyone on earth is a potential rape victim.

I think this is my favorite post EVER

Quote:

Originally Posted by Frownland (Post 1998466)

*cough*

Still changing peoples' quotes instead of figuring out how to intelligently convey your thoughts with declarative sentences?

Quote:

Originally Posted by elphenor (Post 1998479)

thought of sex'ing a 15-16 year old

grosssssss

my guess is rockstars remain children well into their 30's because massive amounts of money stumps growth

money = Drugs, alcohol and lack of REM-sleep.

If you could climb down off of the cross for a moment, I would wager that if you were presented with a few photos of a females in sexy poses, your dick would get hard. All of the girls look extremely similar to one another. Then someone tells you that one of those girls is under the legal age of consent. Can your dick tell which ones are legal and which ones aren't?

Quote:

Originally Posted by elphenor (Post 1998505)

Reagan will always be our worst president

Wrong. That honor goes to Woodrow Wilson for signing the Federal Reserve Act in 1913 and [forever?] enslaving us by stripping our nation's offices of the power to mint/print its own currency, backed by natural resources or reserves of precious metals or gems, etc.

Quote:

Can your dick tell which ones are legal and which ones aren't?

100% agree with this sentiment Space Jew.

Imo most females are not only ****able at 16 but probably as beautiful as they’ll ever be. Some a little younger and some a little older. Every drop of heterosexual male DNA is all about that “sweet sixteen”. 30 year old women being portrayed as prime time sexiness is laughable. Pussy ain’t wine. It doesn’t age well. Go to the beach and look at the high school girls in bikinis. Your eyes be popping out of your goddamn facebone.

Should it have been a crime for Jimmy Page to **** his groupies? Sheeeeit, it would’ve been a crime not to.