Curious phrasing from such an enlightened soul LOL.

lol

Yeah I noticed that

All right, you caught me. I'm a Nazi.

Sorry, Windsock. I want to like you but my loyalty is only for Hitler.

Do you have a mixtape?

You mean "Swastikas Are Just Stick-Figure Ninja Stars"?

https://www.karatemart.com/images/pr...n-shuriken.jpg

News Updatew From [MERIT]
 

► Japan Forcing Transgender People To Be Sterilized


► U.S. Lawmakers Demand Probe Into Pedophile JEFFREY EPSTEIN's 'Sweetheart Deal'


► China: Canada's Arrest Of Huawei CFO WANZHOU MENG Was A Declaration Of War


► Ecuador: U.K. Has Provided Guarantees That WikiLeaks' JULIAN ASSANGE Won’t Be Extradited To Face Death Penalty


► WikiLeaks' JULAIN ASSANGE Rejects Terms Of Ecuadorian President LENIN MORENO's Deal To Leave Country's Embassy In London


► Maryland Senator BEN CARDIN Making Behind-The-Scenes Push To Slip Law Banning Boycott Of Israel Through Lame Duck Session


► Riots Trigger French MP's To Launch 'No Confidence' Vote Against President EMMANUEL MACRON


► Luxembourg To Offer All Public Transportation Free Of Charge


► Venezuela & Russia Ink Multi-BILLION Dollar Investment Deal


► Suicide In The U.S. Reaches A 50-Year Peak

That Japan trans story is pretty crazy

and Finland too

3 St. Louis cops were charged with beating up a person who was protesting the acquittal of Jason Stockley, a white police officer who killed a 24-year-old black man, Anthony Lamar Smith, after a high-speed chase in 2017. The protester that got assaulted? Well, he turned out to be an undercover cop. They beat up their fellow officer. You can't make this shit up.

(source: The New York Times)



[EDIT: Is this posting style better? Crybabies. Because I think it's lame.]

I still prefer this:


► STL Cops Indicted For Inadvertantly Assaulting Fellow Officer Who Was Undercover At Protest


The bullet point, bold and underlining make it stand out, so that you know that it is a post of a news story, rather than normal diatribe or conversation. You can hover over the hyperlink to get the URL source, and I can word it so that it tells you as much info about the link as possible, while still being short enough to be used as a headline. With the first style, you are forced to read a whole paragraph about the story. What if you read it and get to the end and realize that you wasted your time because the story sucked or was of no interest to you? With the second method, you can read a single sentence and know whether or not you care enough to read about the whole story.

Post how ever you like. They're just giving you **** to give you ****.