Lucem Ferre |
11-04-2019 08:41 PM |
Quote:
Originally Posted by elphenor
(Post 2087767)
I disagree that you just kill the child
|
Nah, **** this idea that children are more valuable humans.
Quote:
if we assume the 100 people are going to naturally die if we don't
|
It'd most likely be a terrorist situation where we're given a choice. If it's naturally, then maybe that's different but you really should consider killing the kid. The argument is the kid doesn't get the chance to live while the people do. We don't know the age of the people and just because you're an adult doesn't mean you don't still have life to live. The kid won't know what he's missing and there's a high chance that he doesn't like his life when he finally gets to live it.
Then again, of course we need to consider the wants of those affected. Lets say majority of the 100 people would rather die to keep the kid alive. Then lets kill the 100 people. Vice versa as well.
|