the *** sex & religion thread (quote, Lute, Ching, Hang)

[cardboard adolescent]

Originally Posted by dollie

ive always looked at this way that d*cks and vaginas just go better together. like seatbelts do.

you do understand that tight=good, right?

[cardboard adolescent]

that a dick and an asshole might go better together than a dick and a vagina?

[dac]

Originally Posted by cardboard adolescent

that a dick and an asshole might go better together than a dick and a vagina?

There's poo in there though...

[sleepy jack]

Homosexuality isn't simply a choice of "well I prefer to sick my penis in anuses." It's a biological condition much like heterosexuality; not a random fetish. This idea that penis + vagina = proper is wrong. I'm going to repost a bit of what toreorden said because it's still relevant.

Originally Posted by toretorden

So, to sum up - the most likely reason human males have a g-spot up their butt is to make them sexually compatible with other males which in turn smoothens social relations, something that would generally increase fitness back in the times when this adaption came around. Also, homosexual behaviour is common in many species of large mammals (like us humans) and while it may be considered "unnatural" by religious teachings or culture, there's no real biological reason for assuming it is.

[Inuzuka Skysword]

Haha, the Ayn Rand hate is hilarious.

[sleepy jack]

You mean "the Ayn Rand hate is right." The only thing worse than her novels is her philosophy.

[cardboard adolescent]

True dat

[anticipation]

Originally Posted by sleepy jack

You mean "the Ayn Rand hate is right." The only thing worse than her novels is her hair-do.

burnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnn.

[Inuzuka Skysword]

Originally Posted by sleepy jack

You mean "the Ayn Rand hate is right." The only thing worse than her novels is her philosophy.

The thing is, to be at all credible you would have to tell me why it is so horrible to live life according to one's own rational judgment. Everyone that criticizes her never really gives reasons why her philosophy is "horrible". Meanwhile, post-modernists get all the credit in the world. They even dominate the Democratic party. Post-modernism, the idea that logic doesn't work, gets credit...

...of course, if I started talking about religion then everyone suddenly turns on their "logic switch".

Oh and what novels have you even read by her?

[sleepy jack]

Are you really going to compare religion and morality? The difference is one has a text presupposed the theology that tries to explain why we're here and how we should live to enter an afterlife. Morality on the other hand is an on-going and ever evolving human condition that changes from person to person.

I don't have a problem with living life "according to one's own rational judgment" but the extent to which Rand takes it isn't rational, it's just selfish.

I've read the Fountainhead and Atlas Shrugged both were far too long and felt incredibly wooden.