|
|||||||
| Register | Blogging | Today's Posts | Search |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#14 (permalink) | |
|
Juicious Maximus III
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Scabb Island
Posts: 6,525
|
Quote:
According to the Occam's razor principle which is popular in science, the simplest explanation is the best. The simplest explanation is the one which requires you to do the least amount of new assumptions about the universe we live in. The assumption we do not have souls does not lead to any troublesome assumptions in science - it is pretty consistent with what we know so far. The assumption that souls do exist will lead to a lot of new assumptions and so is the unfavourable option. What I mean is that if there's no way to prove souls' existence, you should be critical and sceptical in your thinking around the subject if you want to minimize the chance of you believing in something which is wrong. I don't believe in things which have no energy and no mass and can't possibly be measured in any way. Even abstract concepts like thoughts are made from something. If souls really do exist, it should be possible to measure one. The same goes for God!
__________________
Something Completely Different |
|
|
|
|
|
|