The God Particle - Music Banter Music Banter

Go Back   Music Banter > Community Center > The Lounge > Current Events, Philosophy, & Religion
Register Blogging Today's Posts
Welcome to Music Banter Forum! Make sure to register - it's free and very quick! You have to register before you can post and participate in our discussions with over 70,000 other registered members. After you create your free account, you will be able to customize many options, you will have the full access to over 1,100,000 posts.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 08-31-2009, 03:13 AM   #1 (permalink)
Music Addict
 
Darkest Hour's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 764
Default

George Noory just had this guy on last week, and he talked about this. I would suggest watching it to be honest. At least this part.

YouTube - Nassim Haramein - 2009 - Space Time & Physics - Coast TO Coast AM - 6/11
__________________
<a href=http://img43.imageshack.us/img43/2131/bulletformyvale1.jpg target=_blank>http://img43.imageshack.us/img43/213...formyvale1.jpg</a>
Darkest Hour is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-31-2009, 04:15 PM   #2 (permalink)
/
 
Rickenbacker's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: The Conn
Posts: 1,338
Default

The Catholic Church already does say that.
Rickenbacker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-31-2009, 08:37 PM   #3 (permalink)
isfckingdead
 
sleepy jack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 18,789
Default

You're really good at that.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by METALLICA89 View Post
Ive seen you on muiltipul forums saying Metallica and slayer are the worst **** you kid go suck your **** while you listen to your ****ing emo **** I bet you do listen to emo music
sleepy jack is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-02-2009, 06:14 AM   #4 (permalink)
Juicious Maximus III
 
Guybrush's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Scabb Island
Posts: 6,525
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by RezZ View Post
Does anyone who marginally understands mind explaining this whole theory/experiment?
I understand the basics. If you know there are atoms, but you don't know what they're made up of, you can bang two atoms together really hard so they break into smaller pieces. With very fine measuring equipment, you can try and register those smaller bits.

That's what particle colliders do. They just bang particles together and hopefully, one can register the existence of even smaller particles than the ones you banged together. Perhaps it's somehow possible to get to the "bottom" of things (Higgs boson?), perhaps not. Discoveries of smaller particles and how they all relate to eachother advance physics.

edit :

In order to explain physics, some phycisists have hypothesized the existence of certain particles without actually knowing if they exist or not. That's part of what makes these experiments seem so deterministic, although they can't predict what's going to happen or what they will find, they're also looking for particles that so far only exist in theory.
__________________
Something Completely Different
Guybrush is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-02-2009, 03:22 PM   #5 (permalink)
Registered Jimmy Rustler
 
Dr_Rez's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: USA
Posts: 5,370
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by toretorden View Post
I understand the basics. If you know there are atoms, but you don't know what they're made up of, you can bang two atoms together really hard so they break into smaller pieces. With very fine measuring equipment, you can try and register those smaller bits.

That's what particle colliders do. They just bang particles together and hopefully, one can register the existence of even smaller particles than the ones you banged together. Perhaps it's somehow possible to get to the "bottom" of things (Higgs boson?), perhaps not. Discoveries of smaller particles and how they all relate to eachother advance physics.

edit :

In order to explain physics, some phycisists have hypothesized the existence of certain particles without actually knowing if they exist or not. That's part of what makes these experiments seem so deterministic, although they can't predict what's going to happen or what they will find, they're also looking for particles that so far only exist in theory.
Wouldn't the chances of them being successful being absurdly low?
__________________
*Best chance of losing virginity is in prison crew*
*Always Checks Credentials Crew*
*nba > nfl crew*
*Shave one of my legs to pretend its a girl in my bed crew*
Dr_Rez is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-02-2009, 03:27 PM   #6 (permalink)
Juicious Maximus III
 
Guybrush's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Scabb Island
Posts: 6,525
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by RezZ View Post
Wouldn't the chances of them being successful being absurdly low?
I think so, I guess they have to do these collisions over and over and over again ..
__________________
Something Completely Different
Guybrush is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-03-2009, 10:20 PM   #7 (permalink)
carpe musicam
 
Neapolitan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Les Barricades Mystérieuses
Posts: 7,710
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by toretorden View Post
That's what particle colliders do. They just bang particles together and hopefully, one can register the existence of even smaller particles than the ones you banged together. Perhaps it's somehow possible to get to the "bottom" of things (Higgs boson?), perhaps not. Discoveries of smaller particles and how they all relate to eachother advance physics.

edit :

In order to explain physics, some phycisists have hypothesized the existence of certain particles without actually knowing if they exist or not. That's part of what makes these experiments seem so deterministic, although they can't predict what's going to happen or what they will find, they're also looking for particles that so far only exist in theory.
I find it funny that the sceintist threw away the idea of æther and then take up the all pervasive Higgs Fields. lol
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by mord View Post
Actually, I like you a lot, Nea. That's why I treat you like ****. It's the MB way.

"it counts in our hearts" ?ºº?
“I have nothing to offer anybody, except my own confusion.” Jack Kerouac.
“If one listens to the wrong kind of music, he will become the wrong kind of person.” Aristotle.
"If you tried to give Rock and Roll another name, you might call it 'Chuck Berry'." John Lennon
"I look for ambiguity when I'm writing because life is ambiguous." Keith Richards
Neapolitan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-02-2009, 04:56 PM   #8 (permalink)
Partying on the inside
 
Freebase Dali's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 5,584
Default

Any word on LHC and the status? I know they started it up already, but I seem to remember something about some problems they had to work through. I didn't get much information about it.
__________________
Freebase Dali is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-03-2009, 06:42 AM   #9 (permalink)
Juicious Maximus III
 
Guybrush's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Scabb Island
Posts: 6,525
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Freebase Dali View Post
Any word on LHC and the status? I know they started it up already, but I seem to remember something about some problems they had to work through. I didn't get much information about it.
As far as I know, they've had problems with the magnets and so it's not fully operational yet. I think they're scheduled to have it ready to run experiments in november.

I'm quite looking forward to the publications .. Although physics is not my field and it's a bit hard to sorta hang on when it gets advanced, I find it extremely interestnig. Wouldn't like to work with it though!
__________________
Something Completely Different
Guybrush is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-03-2009, 09:29 PM   #10 (permalink)
Partying on the inside
 
Freebase Dali's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 5,584
Default

I get a hard on for physics.
I'm definitely on seat edges about the experiment results when it happens.
__________________
Freebase Dali is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply




© 2003-2025 Advameg, Inc.