College campus bans cross dressing - Music Banter Music Banter

Go Back   Music Banter > Community Center > The Lounge > Current Events, Philosophy, & Religion
Register Blogging Today's Posts
Welcome to Music Banter Forum! Make sure to register - it's free and very quick! You have to register before you can post and participate in our discussions with over 70,000 other registered members. After you create your free account, you will be able to customize many options, you will have the full access to over 1,100,000 posts.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 10-22-2009, 04:51 PM   #11 (permalink)
Facilitator
 
VEGANGELICA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Where people kill 30 million pigs per year
Posts: 2,014
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by boo boo View Post
While I agree with you, I do think I understand what Morehouse's point of view is.

I think they want to put out a more positive image of black students so this is probably more about banning "gangsta" attire than crossdressing. Also, I could understand banning crossdressing just because it can lead to violence caused out of intolerance.

But, that would be like banning black people from a college just to avoid racial violence
.
We agree, we agree...boo boo agrees with me! (I'm doing a little dance over here).

I agree that banning certain types of clothing to reduce actions of violence is similar to banning black people to avoid racial violence...both end up punishing the victims for something for which those being violent should be accountable. If people are beng violent, then I feel a college should focus on stopping the people who react to (clothing? colors?) by being violent, since that is what the real problem is. The clothing is not the problem.

I watched the video in the news item you posted, boo boo, and the feeling I got was that the interviewer and the interviewed gentlemen both have a snooty attitude that "we in our suits look well put-together and professional, and those students showing off their underpants (gasp!) are slovenly and scornful!" To me these two men smirking at others and complimenting each other on coming to work wearing "professional clothing" sound laughably shallow. Part of the history they are mired down in is that Martin Luther King and related civil rights crusaders tried to dress very professionally so that they would be taken seriously rather than have their message dismissed. Morehouse is probably afraid of African American men losing power and status in society if they don't dress "professionally."

I happened to be in a book mobile last night and found a children's book all about the history of underwear and preposterous undergarments as well as preposterous views over the years about what has been considered appropriate attire. Showing underwear under baggy pants may seem silly to those not used to it...but people with that reaction should think about the fact that the T-shirt was once *only* an undergarment, and it took a movie to boost the T-shirt into mainstream outerwear.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Neapolitan:
If a chicken was smart enough to be able to speak English and run in a geometric pattern, then I think it should be smart enough to dial 911 (999) before getting the axe, and scream to the operator, "Something must be done! Something must be done!"
VEGANGELICA is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-22-2009, 05:28 PM   #12 (permalink)
____
 
FaSho's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: NC
Posts: 5,279
Default

Quote:
YOUR KIDDING ME..WHY DO GUYS LIKE TO CROSS DRESS....THATS SO GAY
.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Janszoon View Post
What? No. No. No. No no no.
FaSho is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-22-2009, 07:10 PM   #13 (permalink)
Music Addict
 
storymilo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 1,845
Default

^ Who posted that? It's deleted now
storymilo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-22-2009, 09:58 PM   #14 (permalink)
Account Disabled
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: VAN
Posts: 2,530
Default

oh no!
CAPTAIN CAVEMAN is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-23-2009, 02:48 AM   #15 (permalink)
nothing
 
mr dave's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: everywhere
Posts: 4,315
Default

there's a time and place for everything. the school is not trying to enforce a lifestyle change or anything of the sorts.

a dress code is not a cause for major distress. consider it from a business perspective - where it generally applies the most. if an employee can't be personally inconvenienced enough to not show up to the job in their PJs do you really think they're going to be focusing their full attention on what anyone else wants? would any of you go into a business deal with someone who can't be bothered to wear pants?

while there would obviously be a few who would, the vast majority of people would not. if i'm making a business deal with someone i expect them to be taking my interests seriously while they're working, if they can't be serious enough to dress the part then i'm not going to stick around to watch their attempt at acting the part.

plus it's an all male school... i'm sure some of the older faculty really liked seeing dudes in drag. they lived through riots and discrimination and beat down at every turn so that some guy could wear a dress on their campus? pretty sure i'd object to that, like i said at the start, time and place. part of post secondary education is to prepare the student for the realities of working for a living, if a dress code is causing you major issues you'd better hope mummy and daddy didn't renovate your room.
__________________
i am the universe

Quote:
Originally Posted by bandteacher1 View Post
I type whicked fast,
mr dave is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-23-2009, 10:17 AM   #16 (permalink)
Facilitator
 
VEGANGELICA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Where people kill 30 million pigs per year
Posts: 2,014
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mr dave View Post
there's a time and place for everything. the school is not trying to enforce a lifestyle change or anything of the sorts.

a dress code is not a cause for major distress. consider it from a business perspective - where it generally applies the most. if an employee can't be personally inconvenienced enough to not show up to the job in their PJs do you really think they're going to be focusing their full attention on what anyone else wants? would any of you go into a business deal with someone who can't be bothered to wear pants?

while there would obviously be a few who would, the vast majority of people would not. if i'm making a business deal with someone i expect them to be taking my interests seriously while they're working, if they can't be serious enough to dress the part then i'm not going to stick around to watch their attempt at acting the part.

plus it's an all male school... i'm sure some of the older faculty really liked seeing dudes in drag. they lived through riots and discrimination and beat down at every turn so that some guy could wear a dress on their campus? pretty sure i'd object to that, like i said at the start, time and place. part of post secondary education is to prepare the student for the realities of working for a living, if a dress code is causing you major issues you'd better hope mummy and daddy didn't renovate your room.
Hello Mr. Dave,

While I agree that in business, people will likely wish to deal only with employees who put them at ease by wearing "professional clothing," I feel that a dress code at a college *is* a cause for distress because a code is built on, and perpetuated by, a power structure in which the majority dominate the minority.

The liberal arts tradition...and education as a whole...should be about much more than simply getting and keeping a job. A dress code represents a mental limitation, an unquestioning deference to "authority," an acceptance of one's subservience to others, that are the moral opposites of the freedom of thought and inquiry I feel institutions of higher learning should support.

Morehouse claims to be more than just a trade school teaching people to get jobs. Indeed, their website states:

Quote:
from: Morehouse College

A Proud Tradition of Producing Outstanding Leaders:
Although times change, Morehouse’s mission remains steadfast: to produce academically superior, morally conscious leaders for the conditions and issues of today, whether “today” is post-Civil War or turn of the new millennium. The College's mission is to develop men with disciplined minds who will lead lives of leadership, service and self-realization, emphasizing the continued search for truth in the liberal arts tradition. Martin Luther King Jr. led the country through one of its most transforming civic movements; David Satcher resuscitated the issues of health care disparity and access; Maynard Jackson taught the world the value of diversity and equal access as the first African American mayor of Atlanta. All helped change the world. All are Morehouse men.
A dress code, which is based on unquestioned, traditional views, is a form of oppression that stands in direct opposition to self-realization, diversity and equal access, which Morehouse professes to value. I feel that college is the perfect time and place in which to allow young adults to learn about, question, and challenge social structures. College should, I feel, be a time of discovery during which people get to flex their minds rather than feel constrained by the realities of the working world that they may soon face.

People who "lived through riots and discrimination and beat down at every turn" should understand that they did so *exactly* so that "some guy could wear a dress on their campus." Interestingly, studies show that African Americans tend to be more homophobic than Caucasian Americans, but are more likely to support equal legal rights for people who are homosexual or transgendered (http://alligatorreport.wordpress.com...ty-homophobic/).
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Neapolitan:
If a chicken was smart enough to be able to speak English and run in a geometric pattern, then I think it should be smart enough to dial 911 (999) before getting the axe, and scream to the operator, "Something must be done! Something must be done!"

Last edited by VEGANGELICA; 10-23-2009 at 10:33 AM.
VEGANGELICA is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-23-2009, 05:53 PM   #17 (permalink)
Dr. Prunk
 
boo boo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Where the buffalo roam.
Posts: 12,137
Default

^ What she said.
__________________
It's only knock n' knowall, but I like it

http://www.last.fm/user/kingboobs

Quote:
Originally Posted by Strummer521
Quote:
Originally Posted by Crowquill View Post
I only listen to Santana when I feel like being annoyed.
I only listen to you talk when I want to hear Emo performed acapella.
boo boo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-23-2009, 06:34 PM   #18 (permalink)
nothing
 
mr dave's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: everywhere
Posts: 4,315
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by VEGANGELICA View Post
A dress code, which is based on unquestioned, traditional views, is a form of oppression that stands in direct opposition to self-realization, diversity and equal access, which Morehouse professes to value. I feel that college is the perfect time and place in which to allow young adults to learn about, question, and challenge social structures. College should, I feel, be a time of discovery during which people get to flex their minds rather than feel constrained by the realities of the working world that they may soon face.
it's also the best time to learn how to pick and choose your battles. i could understand calling it oppressive if they were instituting a specific uniform, they're simply asking their students to dress appropriately. like i said before, if having to change out of your PJs is considered a form of oppression then you should just go back to your parent's place and leech off them.

even finding dress code information on their site is challenging. the closest to a defined wardrobe that i found were a few classes that specified a business casual wardrobe. a collared shirt and dress pants!!! oh the humanity! no tie, no jacket, heck any office i've worked at that had a business casual dress code didn't even require you to tuck in your shirt. OPPRESSION!!! wait.... it specifies that your hair has to be combed and your shoes tied!!! NOOOOOO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
__________________
i am the universe

Quote:
Originally Posted by bandteacher1 View Post
I type whicked fast,
mr dave is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-24-2009, 03:39 AM   #19 (permalink)
Make it so
 
Scarlett O'Hara's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 6,181
Default

Personally I think college kids should be wearing high fashion designer clothes!
__________________
"Elph is truly an enfant terrible of the forum, bless and curse him" - Marie, Queen of Thots
Scarlett O'Hara is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-24-2009, 05:51 AM   #20 (permalink)
Slavic gay sauce
 
adidasss's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Abu Dhabi
Posts: 7,993
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mr dave View Post
it's also the best time to learn how to pick and choose your battles. i could understand calling it oppressive if they were instituting a specific uniform, they're simply asking their students to dress appropriately. like i said before, if having to change out of your PJs is considered a form of oppression then you should just go back to your parent's place and leech off them.

even finding dress code information on their site is challenging. the closest to a defined wardrobe that i found were a few classes that specified a business casual wardrobe. a collared shirt and dress pants!!! oh the humanity! no tie, no jacket, heck any office i've worked at that had a business casual dress code didn't even require you to tuck in your shirt. OPPRESSION!!! wait.... it specifies that your hair has to be combed and your shoes tied!!! NOOOOOO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
You're not actually providing any valid reasons for the said policies, instead you're just saying they're minor inconveniences that the students should live with. I don't think they're going to have a problem doing that, but they do have the right to question the dress code if they feel, as Vegangelica so eloquently explained, it serves no particular purpose other than restricting freedom of expression. And yes, any restriction of freedom, if its not based on valid reasoning, is oppression, no matter how minor YOU feel the oppression is...
__________________
“Think of what a paradise this world would be if men were kind and wise.” - Kurt Vonnegut, Cat's Cradle.

Last.fm
adidasss is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Similar Threads



© 2003-2024 Advameg, Inc.